From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12299: 24.1; no byte compiler warning for inline function call with too few arguments Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:14:06 -0500 Message-ID: <87ligyqwb5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346206508 17034 80.91.229.3 (29 Aug 2012 02:15:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:15:08 +0000 (UTC) To: 12299@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 29 04:15:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T6XoB-00043N-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 04:15:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40508 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6Xo9-0003qi-3l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38933) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6Xo6-0003pH-9D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6Xo5-0001ke-4o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6Xo5-0001kT-1e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:15:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6Xp4-0001PF-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Roland Winkler" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 12299 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13462065185351 (code B ref -1); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2012 02:15:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55138 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6XoL-0001OG-CV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:15:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46946) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6XoJ-0001O9-64 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:15:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6XnI-0001VC-Nu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:14:13 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:50075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6XnI-0001V8-Ks for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6XnH-0003ix-Sm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6XnG-0001Ul-Kn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:47254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6XnG-0001Uh-Hh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from adsl-68-77-23-91.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net ([68.77.23.91]:38441 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6XnF-0007mi-HY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:14:10 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63570 Archived-At: cat > foo.el << EOF (defsubst foo (a b)) (foo t) EOF Byte-compile the above file. The Emacs 24.1 byte compiler does not complain that the inline function foo is called with too few arguments. Emacs 23.1 complains foo.el:2:1:Warning: attempt to open-code `anonymous lambda' with too few arguments till it aborts with foo.el:2:1:Error: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size which I do not find very appropriate either. In GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.1) of 2012-06-10 on regnitz Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10706000