From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r111840: Port documentation to Texinfo 5.0. Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:58:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87liahmis0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87txp6ytgg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83621lo9zl.fsf@gnu.org> <51265ACA.9000706@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361479503 12765 80.91.229.3 (21 Feb 2013 20:45:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 21 21:45:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8d17-0007Wj-1h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:45:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40300 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8d0m-0002jd-On for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36233) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8cfj-0003km-HJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:23:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8cfN-0000YH-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:22:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]:62793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8cfL-0000WR-MW; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:22:51 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t44so7837835wey.12 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:22:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=XqJP4H7H8LbcUpxIwzWXRYYKdelvqGRs7Pc4ZeJlEkA=; b=wCQpUswNaLaYsqXpRRoOCEk9y7snChhIohdi1q/WtdoNd2XPzdssR+Zi/M5TgF6c7H IkLuhMYJQcup/L0xnQ75UvnweXCiyqn7aH6E4toYD0Z9qFC0PU1iZrrxoWVHWy4L1Bw/ PKlSCJfJ1CHXDEYarX1XfOFKyltB/xWAr1YhcBBLo/b0OrcbOCJL+65mAT+BduaoE3Lf lxvGZnaYlXTloM4Rh8FC1vVOeXtrJV9nEwqquefiFwwfllRJS3fnHFIpMg6zGA+fa0Iv 4tExUCDFv0EaFo5abrkzXcFRpu6Nq8drkg/yMjKJmcw3wwaAJea5fTUB3oWIIhHRwEC3 9Jbw== X-Received: by 10.194.77.129 with SMTP id s1mr44356241wjw.17.1361476609910; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:56:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q13sm5482664wie.0.2013.02.21.11.56.48 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:56:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4A201C204D1; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:58:07 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <51265ACA.9000706@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:35:06 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157250 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > On 02/21/13 09:25, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I'm guessing he just looked at the warning/error >> messages emitted by the new makeinfo and fixed whatever they told >> needed fixing. > > That's pretty much it. Mostly, Texinfo 5.0 is pickier about making sure > that subsections line up with the corresponding menus, which is > a good thing. Thanks. I just produced the Org manual with Texinfo 5.0 and there were no warnings. But yes, it's very slow :/ -- Bastien