From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Kanis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: patches and one bug Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:23:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87li5yx7mj.fsf@kanis.fr> References: <87bo6v25kl.fsf@kanis.fr> <87ehbrlbxh.fsf@kanis.fr> <87ppvbxpnw.fsf@kanis.fr> <87bo6uww0i.fsf@kanis.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372191794 23621 80.91.229.3 (25 Jun 2013 20:23:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Development List To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 25 22:23:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZlj-0002gq-Ls for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:23:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55928 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZlj-0003tz-9E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZld-0003sz-8W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZlZ-0006om-6u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from kanis.fr ([46.19.35.252]:41741 helo=srv2.kanis.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZlY-0006og-SE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:23:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kanis.fr; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=EAw506I9FSKUghjA4vuQfQo0aJICFCLt2BQ1PO5DP9c=; b=E0EFDPjJKCKUs720IPi9S8fVAirP1nCe1XuARLB0kqouTCTF9dbfXSyxVfWPR0RmhlDwcRxEQ3nhMd/dz1ke2tYa0sPWn6b50NFlKS/s0TaAXFhCWSB/9y77ViEwsUT1; Original-Received: from smtp.comencini.fr ([164.138.25.8]) by smtp.comencini.fr with esmtpsa (TLS1.1:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1UrZlX-0004ss-M8; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:23:04 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAB5QTFRF IBkXUxMTOCwoTC4qcUY8iFxQmmper31txpaJ/v/8aKZ1oAAAAcVJREFUOMt100tu2zAQAFDCXnUZ oAcIqG68LZULVLQBbwuSiffm6AIRRyeotAySJoVu2+FPpJWWC3/4NKOZocSW/yxWfnJ2+Bdwzhj7 8gleWVy7DXC2rkMNr2V/zRbghXIwthf3VbIA9Ffc71vZCSFyCEsBggtNS8ludwvfmhYA0Vn9o4DP zMWxR7+cPWzAYFzwM0ModtdmcDbDS6i/hT7L+RZof5yCXGrYe5jn2YO6BYMjgY+51tCIAqHgBLwR pwLnGuRjAKyBJkuN4yd4U92uCY1vUr2D/c5b8DuxyQwfOHUeaLqDJhnkkuGXbB56h2C1IVBdgncc bBi6feroa9B6jUDojnQPQKupbyXyeeCE1oT7Oqrt+SnfY3mkiyGA/3AmD3H5g32CcBx6hY8pRkwJ 9PpcjRGobUfprFnhAa1vepwcgMOhwG+pdSgKHFU9HAvoAH6XUl7lDUCCq5Qb6GMbVm3Aj++qDYCt wdBc/YHgOFCmS3mjDMRcSE2qY4E3Q3PVIQRQmeodNH4QEbRUFZzW+VotzwX4yTcRTySOML1qjcE5 hTirVqDHkMAP0PjAywp3d18JZtqzvr9zDYD+GaSKtE6Zlr/DLPNFmOcvBAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Hashcash: 1:20:130625:emacs-devel@gnu.org::9OGLDzqK4r6f+5bQ:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000027PU X-Hashcash: 1:20:130625:larsi@gnus.org::NGwVBgwLqowZa6qk:0000azJ In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:51:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 46.19.35.252 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161052 Archived-At: June, 25 at 21:51 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Ivan Kanis writes: > >>>> Do you want a new patch? >>> >>> Yes, please. >> >> Here you go. I have removed wget-api. Instead I use a variable that will >> hold the function to call. > > Ok; mostly applied, but I removed that variable. Doesn't `url-retrieve' > work perfectly? Bummer, I'll have to redefine the function in my customization :( -- Backup tape overwritten with copy of system manager's favourite CD. -- BOFH excuse #10