From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16045: 24.3.50; rgrep can't work Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:50:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87lhzz2fb1.fsf@gmx.de> References: <201312041357404213761@163.com> <8338m84jig.fsf@gnu.org> <87ob4vxrj1.fsf@gmx.de> <83fvq72ndc.fsf@gnu.org> <87y53z2hod.fsf@gmx.de> <8361r32gj1.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386276675 2778 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2013 20:51:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 20:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: zijianyue@163.com, 16045@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 05 21:51:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VoftG-0004eD-FV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:51:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55593 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VoftG-0004Qu-2T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:51:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voft6-0004Qo-Ei for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:51:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voft0-0006Ud-Jl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voft0-0006UZ-GV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Voft0-0006tS-03 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 20:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16045 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16045-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16045.138627663226462 (code B ref 16045); Thu, 05 Dec 2013 20:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16045) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2013 20:50:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60477 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VofsV-0006sj-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:50:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:50395) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VofsS-0006sZ-Ru for 16045@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:50:29 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.37.149]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0MPD8G-1Vt5ik1cdE-004SlS for <16045@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:50:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8361r32gj1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:23:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WW/aW5xy2dclLgII0UljUNeuU7+h8uYEGGkjssT84fNT1bAZyGH iYkgJoJmFpRsuLbhNdzuaBBRt7W1dKr+GfnRK5T/SkT2rYf2TYZx2UYp2aKEcxJOtcyd8Nl 9WJOpdbWcAmZhOHP+3A3vaUvB6QApYM9SeOdY0WCZcJQfeGQSgbs8+TlfKcntHP6IilnXvg sQzOZd0zihqRdoaYIe7kA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81473 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Such commands have short lines anyway, so you would never need to > break them. So in practice here documents should never be a problem. I know. I just wanted to demonstrate, that you cannot enter that line break at any arbitrary point. > Are there any other circumstances where a command cannot be broken in > an arbitrary place? Don't know. > Anyway, you could break on whitespace, to be on the safe side. Nope, see here: $ cat < xxx \ > yyy > EO \ > F > EO F xxx \ yyy EO \ F Again, a very unfriendly and malicious example. But shit happens. > The question was about the remote shell limitations, so knowing about > the arguments doesn't help. It doesn't help to know the exact limitations. But it helps to know where a potential line break could be placed. Best regards, Michael.