From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:37:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87lhyw4xaj.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <20140102095347.6834E381D0C@snark.thyrsus.com> <87fvp6bdd9.fsf_-_@ktab.red-bean.com> <83wqiixqbb.fsf@gnu.org> <20140102172804.GB13245@thyrsus.com> <83vby2xo6x.fsf@gnu.org> <83r48qxg6e.fsf@gnu.org> <87y52y5bau.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83iou1y06o.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha9l5d82.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83txdlw1aw.fsf@gnu.org> <871u0p5bdt.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83r48pvz45.fsf@gnu.org> <87wqih3u7x.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83ppo8x1sj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388781452 10676 80.91.229.3 (3 Jan 2014 20:37:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 20:37:32 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 03 21:37:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VzBUu-0004xr-SJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:37:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51742 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzBUu-0005KD-B5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 15:37:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzBUl-0005Jl-Ju for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 15:37:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzBUf-00005s-L7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 15:37:27 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzBUf-00005l-Dy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 15:37:21 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VzBUd-0004SU-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:37:19 +0100 Original-Received: from 225.red-81-44-202.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([81.44.202.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:37:19 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 225.red-81-44-202.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:37:19 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 225.red-81-44-202.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:usKPoZUnVgOokrWdwrE9h01+91o= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167230 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > You wanna bet? I prefer an environment where I know what can and what > cannot happen. So yo do worry about hypothetical, unknown problems (unknown unknowns). That's fine, but hardly a serious argument against MSYSGit. >> Those rules affects a given process. That means that the fact that >> process `foo' loaded certain DLLs does not affect which DLLs are loaded >> for process `bar', even when `bar' is executed from `foo'. > > I invoked 'make' from the Bash that was installed by msysgit. That > 'make' hang. The same command runs just fine from the MSYS Bash I use > for configuring and building packages. That's a fact. I think I know > the reasons, but if you want to disagree and live dangerously, that's > fine by me. IIUC you invoked MSYS `make' from MSYSGit `bash'. As I said multiple times, that's not expected to work. >> It would be quick enough to run some common git commands from MSYS shell >> to see if it works: clone, pull, status, log... > > I already tried, see above. No, you didn't. As git.exe does not depend on MSYS.dll, the problems you experienced with `make' shouldn't happen. And, indeed, invoking MSYSGit git.exe from a MSYS terminal worked fine for the commands I mentioned above. [snip]