From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Different emacs arrangements in one session Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:08:54 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: <87lhxp6715.fsf@gmail.com> References: Reply-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391605773 25245 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2014 13:09:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:09:33 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 05 14:09:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WB2ET-0004vQ-J5 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:09:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59124 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB2ET-00077t-1r for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:09:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB2EA-00077m-Hd for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:09:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB2E1-0006OA-K7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:09:18 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB2E1-0006O6-DK for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:09:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WB2Dy-0004fS-QI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:09:06 +0100 Original-Received: from e177127078.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.177.127.78]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:09:06 +0100 Original-Received: from rileyrg by e177127078.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:09:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 74 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e177127078.adsl.alicedsl.de X-Message-Smtp-Method: smtp smtp.gmail.com 587 rileyrg Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Iwg8o4L+ifL7ZYP3R5jqMHO48Bo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:95925 Archived-At: Jai Dayal writes: > I don't know what "top posting" is. Its posting a reply with your bit at the top and not properly embedded relative to the text you're replying to. It's generally frowned on for a good reason : the reader can have no idea of what you're replying to without scrolling down and trying to figure out which bit of the original post you replied to is actually relevant. It's a "standard" to not top post for a reason - I would recommend adopting it or a lot of good people with a lot to offer will ignore your posts. > > See, again, you're still stuck on "compiling" (which is really only > 1/3 of See what? See? ;) > the workflow). Even still, remote-compile-host doesn't work because in > order to get to the remote hosts, you need an RSA token, and the last time > I tried that route, remote-compile didn't understand that security feature. > > Jumping around windows isn't bad at all since it can all be done via frames > and keyboards. > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Dan Espen wrote: > >> Jai Dayal writes: >> >> > Since you tried to be pedantic and not actually answer my question, >> explain >> > this: >> >> Still top posting? >> >> > I have code on machine 1. I make a change, compile it, and then git >> commit >> > it. >> > >> > On machine 2 and also on machine 3, I have to git pull, and then compile. >> > >> > Then I have to launch the codes that test it. Machine 1 runs something, >> > machine 2 runs something, machine 3 runs something, etc. >> > >> > That's why I like having multiple terminals in my emacs session; in one >> > frame I have all of my code buffers. In the other frame, I have all of my >> > terminals (ssh'd into machine 2, machine 3 and one for machine 1). From >> > there, I can launch the respective codes, git pull, and compile. >> > >> > You can't do that with M-x compile. >> > >> > So basically, you tried to be pedantic, and were *wrong* with your stupid >> > suggestion. >> >> I see. >> >> Because you can't figure out how to run compiles and tests on remote >> machines then it's impossible. >> I wonder how I've been doing it all this time... >> >> You know, I saw your post and I pictured all these windows and jumping >> around and all that stuff, and I thought, gee, I don't have that >> problem, I think I might be able to help... >> >> Good luck. >> >> -- >> Dan Espen >> > -- Sent using Emacs/Gnus from home ...