From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6457: 24.0.50; Inappropriate error msg for set-variable Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:28:02 -0800 Message-ID: <87lhxorc0d.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87631fje3v.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87k3d9yti0.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83y51ozs7u.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391668219 5842 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2014 06:30:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 06:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6457@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 06 07:30:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBITi-0002Vw-OY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 07:30:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34858 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBITi-0000v1-AW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:30:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBITX-0000t5-Ve for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBITP-0005HX-HN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:30:15 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBITP-0005HD-Ex for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:30:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBITN-0003xD-Bn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:30:06 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:30:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6457 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 6457-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6457.139166816815092 (code B ref 6457); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:30:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6457) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 06:29:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51981 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBISl-0003vL-5D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:29:27 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:43094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBISi-0003v9-6n for 6457@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:29:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBISP-0006mq-TE; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 07:29:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83y51ozs7u.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:10:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBISP-0006mq-TE MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392272949.7654@g9Vk+gDEUM0S2aFVUw3p+A X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84710 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> set-variable: Value `1e+19' does not match type integer of >> scroll-conservatively >> >> So I can reproduce this bug. > > Yes, you can, just in a slightly different way: the user didn't enter > 1e+19, either. Yeah, I said "can", not "can't". >"? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/