From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15171: 24.3.50; (cl) `Common Lisp Compatibility' is incomplete Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:48:15 -0800 Message-ID: <87lhxm43cg.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <169588b2-7ae4-4387-bbe6-96270999ccd0@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391835012 6173 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 04:50:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 04:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15171@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 05:50:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzrs-0002me-TU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:50:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44920 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzrs-0008DE-K7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:50:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzrk-0008Cq-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzrf-0004xg-Fn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzrf-0004wP-AT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:50:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzre-00071A-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15171 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15171-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15171.139183498226940 (code B ref 15171); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15171) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 04:49:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55988 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzrJ-00070R-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:49:41 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:47918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzrH-00070J-3F for 15171@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:49:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzr2-0005EX-6t; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:49:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <169588b2-7ae4-4387-bbe6-96270999ccd0@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:19:35 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBzr2-0005EX-6t MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392439765.49813@QGQDniWNJDtoOpJ/3+Celw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84881 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > This appendix is only a brief summary, it seems, and can be quite > misleading. I'm skeptical that it specifies "a list of all known > incompatibilities" between the Emacs cl* libraries and Common Lisp. > > But it is correct that it _should_ specify them all. Or we could just change the line "The following is a list of all known incompatibilities between this package and Common Lisp as documented in Steele" to "a list of some of the more glaring incompatibilities"... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/