From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Conkeror-like functionality for EWW Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:31:08 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87lhns9j43.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87vbtdz513.fsf@gmail.com> <87oasobdtl.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ppd49lyl.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415043105 3996 80.91.229.3 (3 Nov 2014 19:31:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 19:31:45 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 03 20:31:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XlNLl-00071m-TO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 20:31:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36967 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlNLl-0006NK-Fy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:31:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37820) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlNLN-0005qR-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:31:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlNLH-0007SC-B1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:31:13 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlNLH-0007S5-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:31:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XlNLG-0006jj-GQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 20:31:06 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 20:31:06 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 20:31:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dsmXght2WNwZavPEDx3FF+26TXs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176303 Archived-At: On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 20:15:29 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I'd like `next-error' and `previous-error' bound, if that's OK with you. >> They can take a numeric argument to indicate how far to move in either >> direction. That would be useful either way, right? LMI> Well, `C-u 3 M-x next-error' would just be the same as `3 TAB', right? LMI> So if it's not absolute, it seems even less useful, and we already have LMI> that functionality on `TAB'... For me personally, the keypad / and * keys are bound to next/previous error. It's easier than S-TAB to move backwards, and IMO a little easier than TAB to move forwards. Many modes don't even bind TAB because it's an editing command. So it's a personal preference. I can certainly add next/previous-error support in a hook if you don't want it in EWW itself. I rarely use the numeric arguments, so I have no opinion there... Ted