From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:04:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87lhn9ps2c.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87r3x2qyjg.fsf@wanadoo.es> <546973D0.7050306@cs.ucla.edu> <87ioieqxbb.fsf@wanadoo.es> <54697A45.1040505@cs.ucla.edu> <87egt1rhy4.fsf@wanadoo.es> <546A11D5.3090402@cs.ucla.edu> <87a93prfyq.fsf@wanadoo.es> <837fytddih.fsf@gnu.org> <87tx1xptyj.fsf@wanadoo.es> <834mtxbr4t.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416251098 15762 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 19:04:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:04:58 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 20:04:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqRbV-0004KH-RH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:04:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49765 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqRbV-0001NZ-Ew for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:04:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqRbD-0001Lc-9x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:04:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqRb7-0005oX-Cl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:04:31 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqRb7-0005oN-6y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:04:25 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqRb5-00043D-DT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:04:23 +0100 Original-Received: from 132.red-79-158-48.staticip.rima-tde.net ([79.158.48.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:04:23 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 132.red-79-158-48.staticip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:04:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.red-79-158-48.staticip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bHy9ncupbgESiTMyG6/8g9762sk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177479 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Ok. Commit to master or emacs-24? > > emacs-24, please. The patch does not apply on emacs-24 (4 hunks fail). This can be adapted, of course, but then there will be conflicts when merging emacs-24 into master. I don't like the idea of forcing someone to fix conflicts on areas he most probably don't know. Since this is a correctness change that solves an hypothetical future problem, I'm inclined to check it into master and leave emacs-24 as is. Opinions?