From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:32:24 +1100 Message-ID: <87lhkaecbb.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <83r3u3cady.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423272916 935 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2015 01:35:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 01:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19791@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 07 02:35:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YJuIk-0007AQ-Nr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 02:35:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51137 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJuIj-0006UV-Ml for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:35:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJuIf-0006TV-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJuIY-0006Ae-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJuIY-0006A6-Gi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJuIY-00007U-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19791 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19791-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19791.1423272861403 (code B ref 19791); Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2015 01:34:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJuHs-00006R-Hf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:34:20 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.syd.comcen.com.au ([203.23.236.77]:4354) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJuHp-00006I-R6 for 19791@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:34:18 -0500 Original-Received: from building.gnus.org ([27.96.197.126]) by smtp.syd.comcen.com.au (8.13.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id t171WTTq026001; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:32:29 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:09:33 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-comcen-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-comcen-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-comcen-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.124, required 4, AWL 0.02, BAYES_50 0.00, RDNS_NONE 0.10) X-comcen-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99113 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I know; I was just pointing out that we might need to be careful with > the corner cases. The colours should probably not be adjusted if the HTML document provides both the background colour and the foreground colour. That's done today, though. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/