From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20943: 25.0.50; Dired buffers are not always auto-reverterd Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:58:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87lhf0berl.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87y4j1oy87.fsf@openmailbox.org> <83bnfx2ckn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1435730365 21660 80.91.229.3 (1 Jul 2015 05:59:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 05:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20943@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mark Karpov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 01 07:59:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAB38-0001Fp-9O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:59:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49723 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAB37-0002bB-Cg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:59:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53178) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAB33-0002at-8L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAB30-0007WJ-2D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAB2z-0007W1-VG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAB2z-0001JK-LV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 05:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20943 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20943-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20943.14357303135000 (code B ref 20943); Wed, 01 Jul 2015 05:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20943) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2015 05:58:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAB2W-0001IY-DO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:58:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:54981) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAB2T-0001IK-N8 for 20943@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:58:30 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([79.195.13.219]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LzLJR-1YwgVq1Txx-014SHj; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:58:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83bnfx2ckn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:58:16 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xnPlrfX7gNstlPtVGmXEc68mZZHWEdBh0j9oqUZBa2sgj9OuBwl LIq7vLp2tUknqLvoCuFCv7mnI4VS1kEVMC8DO6VOK/zFpQLpO9S+BM9fYdeSgdMLz+TkQhz e5ljsXDCS9gk0LglVS/XAgXU+wZTvbr0qEjw+5yUl9TTq2GiQ2AfSzFPvsrrMq06HygtIqn Faw+V+L5KEkGoqUsfLXZA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:4KUUr4ZeJFI=:e4vqCCmZQgivZ7EnQNmKFH G4ri7FbwQ9KpV4WxQqWPfi0NrsqWfllqS+igWOhrDUymUSVxUHBag4QPnc7YogD0PNpAs1Noc /VTtI3jSCQl/7Rv58lv1fZ3nCY62S08Hc5TdRtYHQgASZKNTQ0+f1i8OeDqyGG5Ldt4KBPEvJ AMfbqJEI04IBYsk7LmRliLCPgI6iHUxFh/GzFOGleFj+YwEjJAB4ugJc4EqFJ2qLj2Det0yv0 v1E/Y9JXoYj6rXvq8jc4hfcBmRBxDeQ4bLD1qicSsHuh0yI/k7vHibXl7so6M7Wrp/SKZawLh do+sCYWQApB9/hmSN25l+3pyLkLmHfRUwTD6wwEkHCCtxQVEfPW6pDdv0QCuX/2lKlRNCCoz4 dLvnlbh+jGnYr5ZEmJeyDhp0o4eb9rq3MQuU/CYyHilgpxcnjmvyM2D6Uht/Nm6dqihFBsfUy F4pOMT3DxiqtGf3tSZRsuvwfwwkLBjQrsOLUe20NzOIJ8UU4ik3M+ZIH7NRchm99BFVEwZMI1 WdOoboNOoICpsK3sx514xt3bd+BJ+HovdQ5K0ZAKvo2L8vtNTwS1loWkyGN77kEdC4HuOaDFf 6z8hskpxOb2mWIRUFJzLjJjwH3XvxBQ2x16v/xGjl4QhpxubwZQ+UV7DbvWwPwAeO4AmbaEkG Mak0Hem5JoRZOmcZspQ6awvkqQPVI7ouNJFHH8XbTTPuI/igBDDODsB15WJ7aDNgKKng= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104560 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Mark Karpov >> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:19:36 +0600 >>=20 >> I'm using =E2=80=98global-auto-revert-mode=E2=80=99 setting variable >> =E2=80=98global-auto-revert-non-file-buffers=E2=80=99 to t, like this: >>=20 >> (setq global-auto-revert-non-file-buffers t) >> (global-auto-revert-mode 1) >>=20 >> As far as I know, this is normal way to make Dired automatically >> redisplay its buffer when contents of target directory are >> changed. However, it doesn't always work. In some cases Dired buffer is >> updated just fine, but there are also times when changes in target >> directory don't cause redisplaying. >>=20 >> Is it a known problem? Can it be fixed? If it's a problem unique to my >> machine (I doubt it, though) I can give your more information. > > Does it happen with some specific type of directories, like those > mounted in some special way? Furthermore, which kind of changes of the directory are you referring to? Reading `dired-buffer-stale-p', the dired buffer shall be reverted only if there is a new file in the directory, or a file is removed. Just changing (the timestamp of) a file in the directory shall not revert the dired buffer. A second thought: auto-reverting dired buffers has been changed to use file notifications. Does it make a difference, when you eval the form (setq auto-revert-use-notify nil) ? Best regards, Michael.