From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21666: Bug is indeed undo-list and GC related Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:43:56 +0000 Message-ID: <87lh5r3bcz.fsf@russet.org.uk> References: <87y4f9dhlh.fsf@loki.jorgenschaefer.de> <83mvq7ptrj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457538335 31103 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2016 15:45:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21666@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jorgen =?UTF-8?Q?Sch=C3=A4fer?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 16:45:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adgIV-00038F-56 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:45:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42202 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adgIU-0005J4-Nl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:45:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59049) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adgIM-0005CI-H6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:45:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adgII-0006y4-F3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adgII-0006xx-BJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adgII-0000XW-40 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21666 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21666-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21666.14575382441985 (code B ref 21666); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21666) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2016 15:44:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41686 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adgHM-0000Vw-Lh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com ([31.216.48.48]:44488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adgHL-0000VJ-4z for 21666@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:44:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=4CBYtEALG6XceXaSJWbtwtM3JtwgbkAtinUJY1aurhg=; b=Q/MpRkwW4R5Qd4Js+rAtSX4e2Y 0l4oMFhgmotszJOe8Axv6k0/ADi0AfoJIMdE/o2vjCRJ9L4aLEWvz+w1aHY2/maBOcPtO03WmnFuQ 71ogO3/TAu92YFFaGNm49VLxCtUry6eEQTZTF20quW5deKY5vxbOfBmkrcz9K0p7ON368Oon8ERl1 8wpJahmFw/cxquO59/I40YByRCm1ELwjWGXyCFl7GjY0hYsc2AWnlPGkZafuUnqR/5J4QTRqd5NWc BdvJdQ4X4S72f+QiQpOqXAC/e2RWQOMoHxHp8uUUnl0qp/Vi8Xp/RRIIggHAg9glAQL/NWWOTWpRI BcQqoTTQ==; Original-Received: from janus-nat-128-240-225-60.ncl.ac.uk ([128.240.225.60]:54809 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1adgHE-003Glg-R5; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:43:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: ("Jorgen =?UTF-8?Q?Sch=C3=A4fer?="'s message of "Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:21:45 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114643 Archived-At: You might try looking at commits where the undo-list handling has been changed since 19efb9. To a first approximation, git log --author=3D"Phillip Lord" should show most of these. But these might be good ones to try. ae18cc20f899335cede183f18221b6aae539fd51 957b05c615ee749b569d9fa2b214b2a2d8fa9bda 20aa42e8204f8f0139ba3880cb32ddf88acc9bf4 Phil Jorgen Sch=C3=A4fer writes: > No, I can not. As mentioned, the problem occurs after a day or two of > usage. If you understand the problem better now that you know what preven= ts > it, I am of course happy to run test cases. > > Eli Zaretskii schrieb am Mi., 9. M=C3=A4rz 2016 16:15: > >> > From: Jorgen Sch=C3=A4fer >> > Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:14:35 +0000 >> > >> > I do not know how GC works in Emacs Lisp, but it seems to me that an >> Emacs Lisp program should not be >> > able to segfault Emacs in this manner. It is interesting that this >> problem was introduced sometime after >> > 19efb9 =E2=80=93 an Emacs built from that commit did not exhibit the p= roblem. >> >> Can you bisect it more narrowly? "After 19efb9" leaves a lot of >> alternatives... >> >> Thanks. >>