From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:01:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87lgwwbkzo.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <6e2cffe5-942b-48d4-9ed5-ef39803bcd30@googlegroups.com> <87mvhgsf21.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360o4monq.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaw4gq0j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oa1vlnkk.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1iba6od.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83ins2jq88.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg2p8swx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831sypjmst.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpggip8j.fsf@gnu.org> <87pom8bn7q.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83r36oimof.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478451837 4816 195.159.176.226 (6 Nov 2016 17:03:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 17:03:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 06 18:03:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3QrC-00085k-06 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:03:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45357 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3QrF-0003ZZ-1V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 12:03:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Qq0-0002wI-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 12:02:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Qpw-0004YO-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 12:02:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=38440 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Qpw-0004XI-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 12:02:28 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Qpc-0004hr-84 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:02:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:5/UGsZjNXE48KPTqS7MzzjOfsrY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209214 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> Besides, at this point it borders on technical malpractice to suggest >> >> to users that it's OK to use Windows 9x to run Emacs. >> > >> > How can this be a malpractice, technical or otherwise? >> >> Windows 9X is a virus magnet and reservoir. > > Which has nothing to do with Emacs, even if it's true. As long as Emacs officially supports Windows 9x, it is implicitly endorsing it. Because the basis of the GNU project is political and moral, it is important that we send the correct messages to our users.