From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS C support for nsm.el Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:49:47 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87lgwk3iic.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87twbd3oww.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479221487 29486 195.159.176.226 (15 Nov 2016 14:51:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:51:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 15 15:51:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6f4Y-0004Dx-6E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:50:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46846 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6f4b-0004CS-Gv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:50:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6f4Q-0004CL-9F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:50:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6f4I-00089f-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=58918 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6f4I-00089R-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:50:38 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6f3r-0007uv-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:50:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:GKG02qUHuuTMperPFtsUGeimJdQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209421 Archived-At: On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:19:41 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: LI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I am neutral about this, but wanted to bring it up for discussion. Does >> anyone think this GnuTLS facility is valuable enough to start using it, >> or should we keep nsm.el the way it is, Emacs Lisp only? Lars? LI> I think it would be confusing to put some of this functionality in LI> GnuTLS-specific files and some in NSM-specific files, from a user's LI> point of view. And since NSM has more functionality, I think it wins. LI> :-) OK, thanks for looking! Ted