From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21671: [PATCH] fix python.el hanging up during fontification #21657 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:06:15 -0500 Message-ID: <87lgspdcvs.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87y4f7upjr.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> <871t83yex2.fsf@gnus.org> <87a8mrvjrs.fsf@gnus.org> <87oab7u4i5.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488330375 18810 195.159.176.226 (1 Mar 2017 01:06:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:06:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: immerrr again , 21671@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 01 02:06:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cisiX-0004Lf-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 02:06:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37885 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cisid-0007pd-CP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41895) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cisiU-0007o0-5r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cisiQ-0001RF-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cisiQ-0001R0-4y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cisiP-0007WC-Rl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:06:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21671 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 21671-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21671.148833032228854 (code B ref 21671); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2017 01:05:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60736 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cishi-0007VB-Md for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:05:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f194.google.com ([209.85.223.194]:36022) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cishY-0007Uk-Eu; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:05:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f194.google.com with SMTP id w10so3234293iod.3; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:05:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=VkteYwO3fpMskzsuu0/vXxA6DM33UT4W0qNf+WBL0y4=; b=gIAMKH1/2T1QzY6PDTMfT13RZOVrB639Bjg+lDqecJUk8FzIkRwUpcoImlXN5DNVjX SBq36Xhge7xvzXj+EiHNT+nLUQ900dFTO6oA1XccO9McKxzt5qrt/Waik6Zevj5Dst8D YSjsfoel0gshuD9lbAom+aaUg018EdV8vL6DivECNvrHP7HzWCJJ4+t4uGpGr8r+ONCS pAK4mEu9Svg+JYYrO8uWpXhRc9/Kyl3HHDhdDaoZFPCs9xg/S/erhRki0UYc2lCyaKpQ ATHQgY6uILtHPxkr28Fo6pg2EeLrNvtY2AcB+akrpxVhtekn4X6S5jrNKUNRuadHAE8G T2jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=VkteYwO3fpMskzsuu0/vXxA6DM33UT4W0qNf+WBL0y4=; b=ecRx8ZmcdJviQwIG+xK5lN5jQcHf+uArpJav2NiGeFab6yGMe5evgOy97fRoXRM5Ld lEKjkH+VNgoLcyQV1Tf4wiE1rZVh2VsVoIubYMb70gm7DPWooODPn8YWeWfplrX76Lzx hBF7jFKEHZmMnp4GSKNDEQwJj1G++Jd+X1DA0H0Okl812zUpkdGUpPLcrLNlwmAFO2iY JzuatJMOPZPXtVqByakCqxH576/F3wBbIakHeh6jhvB3vEccl1meIUDd/rozf/zlaM6j 3vrN6spLpKJBBGIDJS7XW3EyYXZBSDZ3Vl+Wdm2ycDSTOeXOIZk/Xa/eect7XZuxPIjL DoiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39khLGmO1SMOp+OkLAb0HrUlL4AakGMeEgckaH7+70X+c3sFfgscR6nJKnV+eeceag== X-Received: by 10.107.145.214 with SMTP id t205mr6450311iod.64.1488330302967; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:05:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 62sm7363841itl.1.2017.02.28.17.05.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:05:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87oab7u4i5.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:04:34 +1100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129970 Archived-At: unarchive 24905 forcemerge 24905 21671 quit Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > immerrr again writes: > >> @@ -1712,7 +1712,11 @@ expressions when looking at them in either direction." >> (python-nav-beginning-of-block)) >> ((memq context '(statement-start block-start)) >> (goto-char next-sexp-pos) >> - (python-nav-beginning-of-statement)) >> + (unless (bobp) >> + ;; If backward-sexp brought the point to >> + ;; beginning-of-buffer, beginning-of-statement >> + ;; will only bring it back. >> + (python-nav-beginning-of-statement))) >> (t (goto-char next-sexp-pos)))))))))) > > I'm not a Python mode user, so I can't really review this patch. I've > reopened the bug -- could somebody else have a peek at this? AFAICT, the problem is solved in #24905, so there is no need for this patch.