From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Allen Li <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>
Subject: Re: Bug: Bulk reschedule with reschedule logging on fails
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 23:38:33 -0700
Message-ID: <87lgq6sffa.fsf@felesatra.moe>
References: <87vb4mw2l3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52322)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>) id 1d7ynA-00048v-5V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 02:38:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>) id 1d7yn7-0005vx-3J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 02:38:40 -0400
Received: from solmarta.felesatra.moe ([198.199.111.162]:42708)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>) id 1d7yn6-0005sq-TX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 02:38:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87vb4mw2l3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (message from Nicolas Goaziou
	on Wed, 16 Mar 2016 22:11:04 +0100)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Hello,

I'm replying to a very old thread about a bug.  Hopefully I haven't
munged the headers.  Following is a summary of the thread.

Allen Li writes:

> When bulk rescheduling TODO items with org-log-reschedule set to
> 'note, only the first marked item will get rescheduled.  I have
> reproduced this on a fresh clone of the Git repo with a minimal
> config.

Nicolas Goaziou writes:

> I can now reproduce it.

> This raises another question, though. What is a reasonable behaviour for
> bulk schedule+log?

Allen Li writes:

> I can think of three reasonable options:
>
> 1. Prompt for a note, then apply it to all affected items.
> 2. Prompt for a note, then apply it only to items that are already
>    scheduled (and hence rescheduled).
> 3. Don't attempt to add a note and just add timestamps.

Nicolas Goaziou writes:

> It is fixed, with option 3. Global note doesn't sound like a silver
> bullet. Also, 3 was much easier to implement.

I believe that this bug has not been fixed for =E2=80=98org-log-redeadline=
=E2=80=99 as I
have encountered it recently, but I have not done a clean repro of it
yet (although I think such a repro may not be necessary).