From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26573: 25.1; emacs 25.1 crashes while I am killing a bunch of lines Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:45:18 -0400 Message-ID: <87lgohovi9.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <7af6b7d7-03b5-490a-b02f-d196867b9828@yk.rim.or.jp> <87wpafrcxz.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87r2y9oxy9.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <3e4ebfef-16e4-4a7e-d591-557029c480c3@yk.rim.or.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1498344254 754 195.159.176.226 (24 Jun 2017 22:44:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 22:44:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 26573@debbugs.gnu.org To: "ISHIKAWA\,chiaki" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 25 00:44:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dOtmh-0008D3-KF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 00:44:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40646 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOtml-0000m4-8d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOtmf-0000ly-8B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOtmc-0005U1-5U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:44:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOtmc-0005Tt-1A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dOtmb-0006hv-JY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:44:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 22:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26573 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26573-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26573.149834423025760 (code B ref 26573); Sat, 24 Jun 2017 22:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2017 22:43:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36072 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dOtmQ-0006hP-JC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:43:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:36519) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dOtmN-0006h5-QB for 26573@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:43:48 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z62so18662417ioi.3 for <26573@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:43:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=KcAlPd66aupC5sS0KgRJqDpg63FnduhacfFNHUD1JnA=; b=IV31ZPsLhV9FkXZLHVoZoHScLXzssBiBSpcDUYfbjw9eqj6wShAomRpq31S1DE1NZF 5vANhrk5JEOhLVMpeQvfeWNdWcgWto6zs0XxddKNWHQbxu9i0EBL/9am3aJX+AVuyMxT uF/Yxed2OGxDOfs0q+yvorsucsBD0nu0kNd3AQW5l8368Lg5ENR/sFlcnuBKfASODA/X x5tb2YSNrXXbCTFv0sj+N93X/fz3IpLJ6KkbBZXEskCNmPWn7tWlH40hWGxAmP7zuaYY UNfZrA/oLDB2acdXDMUvjjTa/vYYSEwKhu2jlM9CMobGktVxRtLEzOiIcRWF5gvclNCU PLgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=KcAlPd66aupC5sS0KgRJqDpg63FnduhacfFNHUD1JnA=; b=FgvFkOBvTn58OUXy46XMs1SG4t/Uc/ILxe7UfLVOfuoREeFfmEib9ZVUCrSIQPYw42 /NpsYHsthfa99Y2c+E7SBReCQU3bD5iq77s/xTtXCvIvytgdX5FMHF3NFjMyPXLc3vBW T7Qu/hq4anSDiacxlKwAfa3IGYeO/wsMp9JXKveMPLvNHsxJxlbUbe9QLughY1ld5+07 m4P30np8h5KS/KFpxpz5Y9vLvfjBkhhUrE1Mz3YS9033VmV8ya+8Ovq55sgW2z44oXWQ iJWga870uucCGQWn7pfpcwa8JCNFh0B3vKOL+7/twll4uGDaPrxht66ydhUK9aFVJZCy XcBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxK53vRIQmFpOwSzYvTUSBRRSEcdcrEGyauLsR9kWD+bDQVEssn nqROiOGhWh2sbhwu X-Received: by 10.107.150.203 with SMTP id y194mr16374785iod.17.1498344221831; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:43:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w65sm5189098ita.21.2017.06.24.15.43.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:43:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3e4ebfef-16e4-4a7e-d591-557029c480c3@yk.rim.or.jp> (chiaki ISHIKAWA's message of "Sun, 25 Jun 2017 07:12:20 +0900") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133856 Archived-At: "ISHIKAWA,chiaki" writes: > Yes, it is too bad that emacs has become a little unstable. > Maybe the distributed souce code management system may have something > to do with it. Before, developers were very careful and use only a > single master repository thus messing it up would have been a cardinal > sin, but > nowadays, people can create various branches and merge them (at least > so that it builds/compiles). BUT, the runtime behavior may suffer. > Just my guess. These problems with the allocater have actually been triggered by a glibc change. The malloc hooks were dropped which forces Emacs to use a different configuration that had not been widely tested for a long time, so meanwhile bugs had crept in.