From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35055: 27.0.50; async-shell-command truncates output lines Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 23:17:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87lfzrw5us.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87tvfkuivn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <877ecd797c.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y34s21vp.fsf@gmx.de> <87zhp6vmu5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r2ah32rr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878swopr3p.fsf@gmx.de> <87y34mc13t.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874l7ajmnx.fsf@gmx.de> <87lg0l1syw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87v9zpgd3t.fsf@gmx.de> <87mul0tfe5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87v9zib2vd.fsf@gmx.de> <877ebxa857.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a7gszd2q.fsf@gmx.de> <87sgukxu27.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875zrfzp4m.fsf@gmx.de> <87mukpznua.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8736mhp047.fsf@gmx.de> <875zrcqtje.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <877ebroj5g.fsf@gmx.de> <8736mfjatu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="215846"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35055@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 30 23:18:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hLa8p-000u2e-W5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 23:18:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53661 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLa8o-00034I-Vp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:18:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34601) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLa8c-00033P-BV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:18:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLa8a-0002Se-AR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLa8Y-0002Ro-I2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLa8X-0004aG-Oh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 21:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35055 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35055-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35055.155665904917581 (code B ref 35055); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 21:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35055) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2019 21:17:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLa81-0004ZV-4s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:17:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:58283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLa7z-0004ZH-0H for 35055@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:17:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1556659037; bh=Cn9CvjwKaLRmOiVeXQ7QULEJybg7qkoNqal7rOLfqgc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=J23lqDQSN8zjH6HbF66F4QhUZV72ulb1f7weDflhiVXtrsIA9sLRwU+S1OutUwEwm X+/GOG+Rl9PvJl4piKIlPhZx78eyw+LE42GWZZVba5kbThkw7lUCJ7UpCgTbNIOwy9 cT74wYE+cKusTOZv9vE2ofvB3P6TH5kxTC/zYNnc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.52.91]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N2mBa-1gcNSz2KVg-0133LP; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 23:17:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8736mfjatu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:51:57 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:FrApfgk/NP9zMIw+ioFYH9P+unh3Nw1sArn7eYWWaQCwcuxeZl3 hPfYMheouc7tul8CwzCGtt/cFPOPzPPYQR5nZdJtNaoXtqn8TE2mfOzpbXOhdJ6VuEJGp3W oyYjGxFsvyNYvcPVgStm5TLLzass3DITuLVc58l4cMAClXkglfMRy8aXReOTmtOiHz0O8o4 VTCoJMzPwXbg0i3HrMJhw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:XixJuVeBQm4=:+PVouGUD9YAx8yc6Fqy3zl NqwWbUa8ZhZplA7aGmPHI22lsotVAWioi3ZK9JPU8qy5zDsMxAl/jnT0gJAMNsCZQDavYsO0V 6zMk4HgoEWWxK/NiYq7J3gt6rkTZxHSDfFHHnoZke7DGS6Ti/eueA7xw3QP1jV2STdoJnr4xn ekcjKOr+lLlei7ZtId0phl4N1v2fb/HXH1egt6dgpiKkBgrWI5N0/eZTxlKnAPh8fXEKZ9cJ6 0cCHSO+OUA01Qe1ukKy/mo7mUHFSfsxsbTxXYxKY8WxWwozE2TBnFUMVm0KETzVknIXh2cZMm /rCl9+io11seIB7+uZURE7HTLZhzPGvOg8C8HUsgq0XmGnoiWHzFBdV5tBl8LAsBkevpmebrm oaLS3Cvl8esUc24A/1oaTvp8lxxxqLdF+dG803p55zkPj7BHuTo86ZJ2LOQWm1bgq72T9st2q nenQQeUxI7VRYFadrJn/AMf8UzjoOkIotKdZCBkr/YJl8XJfM0/imuRpfvhg9o/Z+iIqLpdwq aABalzU4m1JvXy4SKROU7YsInOU7SMrEj6KsRzAAkRuag3mMBxpMcrQkzsOJqiUXttqtgkuHz iabeneJa40YZdAArYuCASBR8UmUgHqZ7JbT2fMnAFLheBMdqlF0ZgdS9aZkzwgRMDjQ3ITbtd X08pq04ALsDDBfeJ8xawx/al+GqRcn3h43P16IGNlPPRdviukoOfyhpNtLeNHCtBbtuYt1kMC AEMj7COzUq8WGltzEPWS6z2KXy8/m7Tf6a12Hs4uLkldL/VhZKwbNIeO0d/BTcxqiDizIS69 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158541 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: Hi Juri, >>> There is no need for the new option to be consistent across >>> both synchronous and async/remote operations. >> >> Call it `async-shell-command-width', that's it. Nobody has asked for the >> synchronous case. > > Yes, this is a safer option. Do you still plan to use that name? As said, I believe it is the better one. Nobody has opposed the last ten days. And, btw, this option still needs to be documented in the Emacs manual. Best regards, Michael.