From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35418: [PATCH] Don't poll auto-revert files that use notification Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 10:22:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87lfzlgvka.fsf@gmx.de> References: <83d0l7v193.fsf@gnu.org> <86EFE367-90FF-4786-BC91-FC28FAF38A4E@acm.org> <877ebdqmbj.fsf@gmx.de> <834l6gu6ee.fsf@gnu.org> <834l6eqdam.fsf@gnu.org> <8bbbdc62bee1dc16b6fd684e7da5ffac43f1e232.camel@acm.org> <87woj9nj77.fsf@gmx.de> <83r29fmz3f.fsf@gnu.org> <6b722334f6eaddcbbf3def636b5181c9439a172c.camel@acm.org> <831s1emvz7.fsf@gnu.org> <26e8159ac86da37d9cf555f6cb3f2dcb63ac0a67.camel@acm.org> <87y33mgo0c.fsf@gmx.de> <05128E42-E970-4C41-9DF9-E9E0BC1C9E4A@acm.org> <87tveagg4f.fsf@gmx.de> <87pnoygdx6.fsf@gmx.de> <8FEB518A-F5AA-488B-BDC5-7947FFE51394@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="208686"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35418@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 05 10:23:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hNCQQ-000s8H-Vz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 10:23:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37899 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNCQP-0005hx-MB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 04:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNCQJ-0005he-0C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 04:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNCQI-00086O-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 04:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNCQI-00086D-1c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 04:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNCQH-0000k4-QH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 04:23:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 08:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35418 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35418-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35418.15570445492811 (code B ref 35418); Sun, 05 May 2019 08:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35418) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 08:22:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNCPl-0000jH-9o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 04:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:49003) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNCPi-0000j1-RG for 35418@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 04:22:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1557044536; bh=G6BjgxduF4unWGNwC21lbpaqXKURxIeoDOHlwq41d+c=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=l1I66J4XZpZBnnM4c/rFiJ/BVg6JWtuWAdN1NfR/7SXMQ1r29NJXhjGL18Q9mJT06 SFl+Pd6vyk5C+XvWUJleRQppL/regznVm9zfFKKuxqCvLQg3YXcOkygWZ96Lx9sfog 2MDZOHf5i5UagNr2HH54qaaHyoi2anzD0AXCpBAg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.57.229]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Me8di-1h6BvF44lC-00PsvH; Sun, 05 May 2019 10:22:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8FEB518A-F5AA-488B-BDC5-7947FFE51394@acm.org> ("Mattias \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Engdeg\=C3\=A5rd\=22's\?\= message of "Sat, 4 May 2019 22:46:15 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VMWqCXJ0mR1NtW8hxMiksPoOykiRcyKv+WDUiBc6ihI01pvxKyr VK9T2CltddkYG3B6muhrsrdhqQhc6aF59LZiP16++BrB8gMgMlwxViXVItFtgrETdzOjpuh JM2TDcmvTqmcuqw18Oe32O+ebWgBWerSF+ni4QUrjV7Agd6rsyauouuxZ8PoCSsVPSCpK9Z Eyc7oAZxS6dZQk/VPOFQg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:vEzPmoYIYg4=:uwIf5795XQDGycFWHdVHTt KaUjS0Nn0+Bk8Bu4OB2vXzTkE8HhyuCVNiL7FgQXKKyw+Nhos3xY91nmyPuGKJBdUmjpkfHDt LjEQka7HMqUiE9VnkPbhuCGIr+XkCj05VDQH222uNTlXOlhdsnazzY/CtQXqVT4Hi/fSpdg0e gbqDzlrz4FiGb1uZE4/yRRZEld4klA/6V4RJHMiHjnHozh2vJwj9Uoyu1763p37zjnwQRASyX n6HRxXDYy3gL4YnyMsv9Fx435Q2TF1+h3L0qA8nfuPmjaFxr15pHOfECRWacVmFQfhgHuEyvU Zxe4Md//H2PKb3VsJr1fYkVcaxpjf2NxYgCss7zdapyh0Yz4bUeAO021y3C0IV1Urag05BOyA NXex+W+ZuT1KWFdQskEwAzDRT+w1WO5Sdb1/9f12UFQ43gF3kyLUK3FqJwNPmEOU79oHHwHu5 gkMtBDG8joPkN6O0GKJdGEaBrU0uXkgLBftrWzG+FwpWQktlaE6IEJYr2R7MQJsP8W1327dPB hD2NMhI8+nftWvmNrersu5SoxHHaJ480R7UKqXQun8WY93GmvLbL7OKtIlD1BA4mjndotAHR2 HftvZBJk47fY7W9EfGJicPy3m4SgVnm/xxfgcoG5pFKXJF9gEdq2Lwcbu+XSOmPE7CaTSOOb0 67RQnmNb+s4iWWTVTq/IIsNe0kdfUcQYbOA43JAacQ2sJeCgiEiVwNEkv7tZZJW3frsloBoK6 VI459HrP3rkK3EtUBMGcaKftoQW6VbmrDWMPsOIxQBjpMtSEIiOp9EjYzhhq1yH5jHGUW0MM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158779 Archived-At: Mattias Engdeg=C3=A5rd writes: Hi Mattias, > Nice, thank you! Does this mean that we can trust Tramp sufficiently > in this respect? That is, notifiers will either fail to be created, > fail with a 'stopped' event, or work. Yes, I think so. Until the next bug report :-) Best regards, Michael.