From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36066: 27.0.50; Error for C-h f in help-fns--first-release Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2019 19:46:34 -0700 Message-ID: <87lfyjmlmd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87tvd7to63.fsf@web.de> <87tvd7mmi2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87a7eztmw6.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="155528"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 36066@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 03 04:53:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXd6M-000eJD-CQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:53:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56739 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXd6J-0007ur-1m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 22:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXd62-0007q7-C6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 22:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXd04-0008FO-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 22:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXd01-0008ET-PT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 22:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hXd01-0000n6-J0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 22:47:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 02:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36066.15595300063019 (code B ref 36066); Mon, 03 Jun 2019 02:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2019 02:46:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hXczl-0000md-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 22:46:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:50554 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hXczj-0000mP-30 for 36066@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 22:46:43 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (71-212-48-133.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.48.133]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1FEEFA02F; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 02:46:36 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87a7eztmw6.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 03 Jun 2019 04:37:13 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:160043 Archived-At: On 06/03/19 04:37 AM, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Ignore me, I should have looked first. But someone else posted >> something about this exact problem somewhere else today... > > Why? It's fixed for me. Double ignore me! Bug#36058 looked similar, and confused me.