From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36771: 27.0.50; mailcap documentation and effect missmatch Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 05:01:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87lftxcl8l.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87ftmxnqw7.fsf@posteo.net> <87pnj9cmf6.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="86294"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Tomas Nordin , 36771@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 07 05:02:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJHp-000MM9-2E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 05:02:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40290 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJHn-00033I-TE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJHh-00032x-6d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJHg-0006cB-49 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:02:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38263) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJHg-0006bz-08 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJHe-0000CH-L9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:02:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 03:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36771 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36771-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36771.1570417286702 (code B ref 36771); Mon, 07 Oct 2019 03:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36771) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2019 03:01:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47084 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJH4-0000BG-2a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:01:26 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:54166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJGy-0000B0-St for 36771@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:01:22 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJGs-0004mN-PI; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 05:01:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pnj9cmf6.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2019 04:35:41 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168478 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> I tried digging into this code, but found mailcap.el too confusing overall... > > Yes, it's really, really confusing. > > There's so many reversals in the way things are sorted that it's amazing > that it sometimes halfway works at all. > > I think I'll rewrite it some, and mark stuff explicitly where they came > from (user/Emacs/system), and then use that to decide what to use. I think this should perhaps now work on the trunk -- at least it works in my test cases. Could you test? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no