From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master ce4ec17: Fix display-buffer-override-next-command to call action only once (bug#39722) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:43:03 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87lfk5mrj4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <20200621233622.23590.68753@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200621233623.C811520A26@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lfkgj5tk.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874kr24p5l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zh8txsdc.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87wo3w9ftf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h7uug7n9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="56939"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 30 01:06:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jq2qk-000Eim-2u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:06:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36246 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jq2qj-0005Pf-57 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:06:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jq2pJ-0003qr-5Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:04:37 -0400 Original-Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:45975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jq2pF-0002dg-QO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:04:36 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 91.129.96.187 Original-Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-96-187.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.96.187]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FB481BF204; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 23:04:30 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:29:53 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.201; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay8-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/29 19:04:31 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252573 Archived-At: >>>> I'd rather try and avoid this complexity because I think it will become >>>> problematic as more prefix commands get written. E.g. the ordering >>>> problem doesn't only affect `C-u` but all other prefix commands, such as >>>> `C-x RET c` (there currently aren't others bundled with Emacs, but there >>>> are others out there). >>> >>> Hmm, I didn't know that set-buffer-file-coding-system supports a prefix arg: >>> `C-u C-x RET f`. > > Not sure how that relates to the previous paragraph. I just discovered a prefix command that supports a prefix arg. This doesn't mean of course that it should set a precedent for other commands to follow. >> BTW, there is also a new command 'same-window-prefix' to request >> displaying the next command's buffer in the same window to override >> the setting that would otherwise display the buffer in another window. > > Yes, I like it (it's been on my todo list for other-frame-window). > >> But the problem is that currently it's not bound, and I can't find >> a good mnemonic keybinding. > > Same problem here. It's part of the low motivation to work on that todo > item ;-) > >> 'C-x 4 0' is already taken. >> 'C-x 4 1' could be reserved for another command that would delete other windows >> before displaying the next buffer in the remaining single window. >> >> Maybe 'C-x 4 s'? > > Since I use `C-x 4` instead of `C-x 4 4`, I'd say that `C-x 1` would be > the "natural" choice, but that's also already taken :-( But you can still use `C-x 4 1` as a submap of your `C-x 4` map where commands of the submap will display the buffer in the same window.