From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48592: [PATCH 0/2] Support plural forms of Author and Maintainer library headers Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 14:10:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87lf84nxgw.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20210522202519.32549-1-jonas@bernoul.li> <83fsyej6bc.fsf@gnu.org> <871r9xon5v.fsf@bernoul.li> <837djpkd8k.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnrpaery.fsf@gnus.org> <871r9xpt5w.fsf@gmx.de> <87v979mhv7.fsf@bernoul.li> <87tumtnvay.fsf@gmx.de> <87sg2dm9tp.fsf@bernoul.li> <87pmxgobne.fsf@gmx.de> <87o8d0mrsh.fsf@bernoul.li> <914C6F2B-140D-4681-A60E-C844A1DEFF29@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25237"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48592@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonas Bernoulli To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 24 14:12:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9RY-0006Kp-1Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:12:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38396 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9RW-0008FG-8g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9RC-0008F6-V1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9RC-0001jw-N1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9RC-0000wh-H0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 12:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48592 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 48592-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48592.16218582723565 (code B ref 48592); Mon, 24 May 2021 12:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48592) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2021 12:11:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9QL-0000vL-Hz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:49567) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9QG-0000ul-Av for 48592@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:11:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1621858257; bh=MDeNeVncKKKCG67IM8KehfJMGd6F+5IqD0OCBmzBCVU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TcfL1d5D6GSle6Z1BXUY/zGh2fTEfx8pO6L9s/usAaV6fJRZQ23R43hEzCmG25Qbc EqfP+mYBVc9eq3dBVzxHFnk33+8sMYULPB8sOxOsZ6v/mhyqgvjeXhVPrGY81IlgFn PdWASOsy7CR2vJrArEH5hx+Nxzd55ATqVLK9jcwo= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([213.220.149.163]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mf0BM-1lDSEF0kG2-00gXmy; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:10:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <914C6F2B-140D-4681-A60E-C844A1DEFF29@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 24 May 2021 12:44:48 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:PlHzwIMa5X3nwdverGy7SES/iHR4CqY4Cegk1x8g/n+GOVM4EtV 1QJsfocnKwZHGlSUFAkRlhP1WOZ/YwA+kqrX/0ly7yog5jgDJ4zL711k3YUf07C64lQnfeC VmP2//T+Sg1zI2UGMT1YKEOBM6bKxjzQWy7CorU3HRtgtqGi+lSSr7FgSyhAIPyliX4sQHe 6b+A2Tam0jRMue1zojSEA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:WxS46K3+uqs=:XSIRdqSLZWC/6HbijUiNJn cCZRuHiYr+dnLOTDUMZu3QAo98ifk9hUrGExs2HrBIL3fVgir8U2+T8L3pYwqprdYiOER5LZv fJ00qbb9jPAEtBINKeKte6netrm6otgzju4amQXoBAh1RnEyM49kMp2WPYmcojmx7C0OsLLo0 Ij4XrT5dOu7j/lXfC4hhw7Ca6Pp8KdO2lp65t79zM2l5npLn17VUhH5Qe8ajI2geavNxXgDH3 z8SAgjAcI09cNtwvb7flKnW4DJpKRpTjt86y13pOp8arzXiQfye6/FbrGW4x+FZTpG4q/NW9R IFjQvTxayxwil0lfODlS0mCWBS8zJ58OyVLdehLug6vnMk3J5McHHyxu1qTKMLcJ/2RH8/U0B Glvb9V5Eua17+hv7nn7piwPHJxKFS+/rw7PcOnN0pUSB39iqIEIFCeAYmTR0TN5pBg2vj3uaj U/WHvJdsBSxWzWK7qxKmQ7hayNc6A8RaosceCWLtSxTIIwOh0kESOQyeAX9F1T4yJMLXzvLWf d0LM1ZCvzAY89u1pjXq2bf6gDedSR8ZAX56hoXTRpoFA/WohrNkVDX6iafMkwNbV8FZkIUQt9 T4KxX58PbMK5jmSYaeWSMSOrtFruEBxBqLR2eg1KHHi4bkOe1TJ1WvQjIYgKKjvnj8SDbMlt9 /zrbuBlkr7BXsHkxdAISZ1N1QsNoYRkWrtFQHjfzzhIr/fLOrz9XmHpaUtIdV7sCn1fTzZLMI TEftKLL1C8wYM1lhUF3aOwxAJW9WkgWEftJmslqlQqOdouhwWuO/8McFA+J6jJSRDpDt++SI X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207123 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Sure adding a note to lm-maintainer technically accomplishes the same, >> but once one has started using lm-maintainer, then one doesn't >> periodically go back to see whether a new notes have been added to its >> doc-string. But something like this would do the trick of guiding the >> attention towards the extended functionality and its updated >> documentation: >>=20 >> In package-build--desc-from-library: >> lib/package-build/package-build.el:516:26: Warning: =E2=80=98lm-maintain= er=E2=80=99 is >> an >> obsolete function (as of 28.1); use =E2=80=98lm-maintainers=E2=80= =99 instead. >>=20 >> Yes, there is nothing wrong with ignoring all but the first maintainer >> (except of course, not properly attributing the contributions of the >> others as they choose to present it), but it seems to me that having >> to: >>=20 >> - (lm-maintainer) >> + (car (lm-maintainers)) >>=20 >> is perfectly acceptable in cases where only "the" maintainer can be >> mentioned because there is not enough room to display the names of all >> maintainers. (So it is still a good idea to list the primus inter >> pares >> maintainer first.) > > > I think this warning will be a gratuitous annoyance in enough > legitimate use cases to make the complaints serious. If it's okay to > take the 'car' of a list, then it should also be okay to call a > function which does just that. It's not like lm-maintainers returns > an opaque object. > > Again, if the others are fine with the deprecation, I will yield. Still fine by me, with this obsoletion warning. FWIW. Best regards, Michael.