From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Trey Peacock Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49341: 28.0.50; bookmark--unfontify with nil filename throws wrong-type error Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 16:35:49 +0000 Message-ID: <87lf6kwwf9.fsf@treypeacock.com> References: <87lf6omnkh.fsf@treypeacock.com> <83y2aohqth.fsf@gnu.org> <877di77ted.fsf@treypeacock.com> <87zgv22ndi.fsf@gnus.org> <87sg0uvy63.fsf@treypeacock.com> <87mtr0zz25.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Trey Peacock Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10533"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Boruch Baum , 49341@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 05 18:37:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m0Raq-0002Zw-Mk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 18:37:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39684 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0Rap-0001Ys-GO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0Rag-0001YU-I8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0Rag-0000Jx-Aw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0Rag-0008PL-4U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Trey Peacock Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 16:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49341 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 49341-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49341.162550296832233 (code B ref 49341); Mon, 05 Jul 2021 16:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49341) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2021 16:36:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46583 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0RZo-0008Nn-0h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.16]:35733) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0RZi-0008ND-Km for 49341@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:36:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=treypeacock.com; s=protonmail3; t=1625502956; bh=+RZr3mCY0NtmYuANa1GkLUcHO3k6JfqYOFywmGqFBYk=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ax2g/9xESN7Prbc9cucuYsA9xmYmbMwBSx9HquwoVCYzduVenNkMCwxUMM8LK9Rrs rYgmkeqNpzJmSy+zySrTTLl2utM29dbXcpMmh3kK5jGZFNK9Gx2L1axCjkAcCj7jO9 +QO7iP9n33OB0J72zW9DxYp7ywJNasoMvU2m89AeZVVP57zKJk3I43f9sdR3FcnoRV xcpYh8HMMKeQUOB0woaDOqrBnVeupJap38EtiFNiXOLY632uxseoFlUiPcK0HfifgV ZxrIeToh1pSHYWfqt0fsLiTdAYsNY1L5JhAGELsJZi+zB62hthWLGfLv2NOyO1yyf4 e12NCB3VgAIXg== In-Reply-To: <87mtr0zz25.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:209475 Archived-At: "Lars Ingebrigtsen" writes: > Thanks; I've now pushed a change that should make `bookmark--unfontify' > more robust. Can you check whether this fixes this problem? Yes, this change has fixed the issue I was seeing. Thanks!