From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: hi@ypei.me, 50195@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#50195: [PATCH] Adding diary-offset, a diary-sexp offsetting another diary-sexp.
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:38:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lf4pitr8.fsf@gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83fsuxvhih.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:24:54 +0300")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> It's how all these functions in diary-lib are defined after the lexical
>> rewrite -- the `eval' depends on those dynamic variables.
>
> Ugh! Is it worth it? If we cannot convert these functions to use
> lexical-binding, maybe we should say lexical-binding: nil in the first
> line of the file, and remove all those gross kludges?
I think having all files lexically bound is a win in itself -- it means
that you know the Lisp dialect without looking at the mode line (and can
write code that depends on closures etc freely).
It does lead to these hacks here, yes, but it's already done, so...
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-25 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-25 3:46 bug#50195: [PATCH] Adding diary-offset, a diary-sexp offsetting another diary-sexp Yuchen Pei
2021-08-25 11:31 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-08-25 11:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-08-25 12:06 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-08-25 12:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-08-25 12:38 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]
2021-08-25 15:22 ` Michael Heerdegen
2021-08-25 15:32 ` Michael Heerdegen
2021-08-25 16:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-08-25 16:22 ` Michael Heerdegen
2021-08-26 6:52 ` Yuchen Pei
2021-08-26 9:26 ` Michael Heerdegen
2021-08-26 6:49 ` bug#50195: [PATCH] Adding diary-offset to diary-lib.el Yuchen Pei
2021-08-26 6:54 ` Yuchen Pei
2021-08-27 13:16 ` Yuchen Pei
2021-09-03 22:40 ` Yuchen Pei
2021-09-04 6:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-04 6:29 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-09-04 7:21 ` Yuchen Pei
2021-08-26 10:26 ` bug#50195: [PATCH] Adding diary-offset, a diary-sexp offsetting another diary-sexp Michael Heerdegen
2021-08-27 13:11 ` Yuchen Pei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lf4pitr8.fsf@gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=50195@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=hi@ypei.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.