From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: script-representative-chars for emoji Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 16:55:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87lf38zvo5.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33443"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 16:57:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPOs-0008Td-Or for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 16:57:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41724 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPOq-0003HR-MJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPNg-0001Fi-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:55:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::435]:40693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXPNW-0006l6-4w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:55:50 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id j8so888458wro.7 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 07:55:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:gmane-reply-to-list:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MQTCGsSO7li3xENOOxpVSlx/0mpKLMRwVfmVy/kspGs=; b=GZa15/093R60nY54gLjXlg9AqxPKoWkWCY76dz+ps6UjVcY0vj4uLxXZhG5JJYboXx Mrc7pOW5wzjK8MLvQQFJiBo+ZTa2CGbGbEcRTLDrc4rDt5E8gjLX8cFsxv+aQVCHu5NM rdJH6Bf2hqU/aLtRqxuqcrLN/rg4TBlBkCOhFJssRGT4wSa8/efWrLUHzNGP0x8CjweZ fi0MGD6yD4l1uxsU6nZ34FqCziMD+3N0COBuueOaefvNM5vkOffm1jj9xsIEozj0k3oL fsuOs+gkIfE/Cf8hYAUlUCU5ZKeBSAWtNUEpm+RphKuD1Q2W79om47ToQvh9jdRN+6jz BUwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:gmane-reply-to-list:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MQTCGsSO7li3xENOOxpVSlx/0mpKLMRwVfmVy/kspGs=; b=7mYLmSv9GbWTjIZcOpk1WeEIURMt9u7MNINwliOCGUyRQ5XC77kdNxrGtRlaoX/4U9 kmRtwZknTUbohjDOEyOLeF0pRTtykoFj3CITFMVYCoWCcKMPQPvuszf0aOD6DMsISHMW bAccxyqEru8dHkRnJd9i9KTBznn9LQmH7uhsYFZ+EB18aCx8hCfdmOwUZVdr1ZDYB4sc ETNYMida9Cp0cL80htB40TWAwh0tKEKw2TToUNdXnhABQXEVBxoSZNcInwiO687vS3lE Bex8M9SuaQH2JcL20gJAId0vsJaSVbuapHDXiDNYwrBiI1646JKYf6FLRBSjgEB+r34T TYJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532O6g4SZQJ4RqvaEJuR7NOB60XWgbI8O+/lCJoAZccB8BVYnDix DJI31ZOLcr94pJTQDN2441ydCxCrINk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUOwEuGJ3l9rrQFwx2m35MI6lFUMEdhK3etbD8wc4wZXnGCfSqRNGB6oOLJMGddeCY9wTSuA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a114:: with SMTP id o20mr13883623wro.95.1633359340015; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 07:55:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f123sm17305743wmf.30.2021.10.04.07.55.39 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Oct 2021 07:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::435; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x435.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276205 Archived-At: Hi, I added the following (emoji #x1F300 #x1F600 #xFE0F))) to script-representative-chars when creating the emoji script, but I=CA=BCm now wondering if that #xFE0F was a mistake, as there are fonts that can represent emoji that won't have a glyph for VS-16. I=CA=BCve not noticed any negative effects so far, but perhaps we should remove it in emacs-28? Thanks Robert --=20