From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36566: 27.0.50; debug is sometimes horribly slow Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 01:23:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87levs3fz8.fsf@web.de> References: <87r26yvb4r.fsf@web.de> <871ryy2l1t.fsf@gmail.com> <87r26xjyon.fsf@web.de> <877e8llbzo.fsf@runbox.com> <8736ilaepu.fsf@runbox.com> <87h871u24i.fsf@gmail.com> <874l2vcrtn.fsf@runbox.com> <874l2eosa7.fsf@gmail.com> <87mufh8jj2.fsf@runbox.com> <87v9tza6gg.fsf@gmail.com> <875zlvj453.fsf@runbox.com> <87bkwp2pjr.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17288"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Gemini Lasswell , 36566@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky , Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 26 01:24:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nj83z-0004IW-UN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 01:24:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37916 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nj83y-0001yT-HX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:24:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nj83m-0001yK-2g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nj83l-0005q6-Qe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nj83l-0003Uf-Lo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:24:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 23:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36566 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 36566-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36566.165092901313395 (code B ref 36566); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 23:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36566) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2022 23:23:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36324 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nj83J-0003Tz-43 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:23:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:37201) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nj83G-0003Tk-JX for 36566@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:23:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1650928988; bh=ND9+Td6PfTGRefHz7IY+GBfFv5aXw8wxhd3LnseWS58=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=JMdtUYWjXI9HDCHPKy1Y9mx9KPanYMjK6hA13A0Za6D8xuSfNA9UkqKydTijMbCHV 5jyRJUCFWg75IA2XS5DZ5WyUFFY+I+YCfC4TRd3tWFll5+R0k5IpzrOwwk5uhtSQEF AvBGEMOS7ECT8fnhGaeKa7t4ymkQLhQ8m3NqHBCo= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([178.14.74.158]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mrft2-1oCwYa2dLI-00npf7; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 01:23:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bkwp2pjr.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:41:44 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:8wfl/LS1Y5FwT2kNh71tZxbtoreo5W0Y3PTpTrXuFgHe3OHphXa jEOrCgIhGAVnPpKNW/xMMRU2bRrlAAwvhxBlLfJXJmP0Lp9fRJVeVZ3iUgElrXFsd4R86pq leR4X8fSvSDjH3zO4nOKZAgRDPQSWNwEUOu4o+USnOzo2dyjdXaEeRciuD5B9vMnGeSAa0f heY7ewpV2KptcL3baamiw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:bLXwdoDmcXg=:FxvU7KdFin4A0BF9tXIGN6 07i4HfxPWi03TgrJ/E/t91tpFS7XBWhZkmOUUu4j+lIrweLCfu3IyNYwbjxSRL7QkfOSyQT6Z 2/9oUjH96ELOqdJQgoyvmFWTeDjTQihGI5tLFCwitC70+4NOT8h7EJ/KoSraOT2VWQMoYMj5w h4hdOBbX95HumFL3ZgUan/dwznpg2eqTFh49eVxNWrh0DED4xU1hQTASBG3Vfyb7tZhVK/Kx7 Lyb6f6RDTtn213xXxRAR8kXzK2mt3RuBsCT+kWju6PFblnlD7K5fSD1zIvbDWx3szLB74Y0Zn bdbHsnpPRAbGuJcO9iJgvknr9eSFq+gN7FMTRYOK3gU09TeQacXtuj8G1Vj4liJY+MFkTJceU /Jrw26NLnqAn7BbozenHXTlb1kOfX7txZfl0V5+6vOjGBVJMSZI9y50dHx/c5Zc24MsttQlAG tht3F8FcWDAIlIi+k6qKz+DwBlig60+8BVWsllJZzo6iBLk/WiKMVJhdS0S/z33E2UTj2bizs oi2UeKdrR8T/MR9aCEd4StmWhgY7/Vv+5Tc0+4KCOuSe7hvCzKSbjg7GBvFz+VZlCko1McMhu +TRkaduUgyeC/grNWHQfuNGk5RdY00fuA1JWd0QIzddYkMz/5J/taITVKQRAscLQn/makYOsG j5Y5yLfIRoj5I7TYONMLmeV2pWjJ/lcErSOAFKH4xeneBnbGPWaqutQLwGM55O9ivtTINMQjq cPRMwwedknqInD+ug1i8bQh3oLYU7rxLhbbNyH8o80QHB1IFvRqpul/LJWEY7tPdtq1GVP87 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:230672 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Skimming this bug report, it's not immediately clear to me what the > remaining performance problems were. Does anybody have a simple test > case that illustrates the problem (if, indeed, it's still present in the > current Emacs -- this was two years ago). I didn't see performance problems with my setup since then AFAIR. Didn't play much with the newly introduced debugger settings and commands though. Let's wait for Gemini's answer. Michael.