From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57907: 29.0.50; Using keywords with cl-loop Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 12:28:18 +0000 Message-ID: <87leqgdfz1.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87tu54dh3t.fsf@posteo.net> <87wna027sr.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9761"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 57907@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 18 14:30:37 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oZtRU-0002LC-71 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 14:30:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54300 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZtRS-0007qh-Vj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZtPy-0006bh-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZtPy-0008ED-G8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZtPy-0008DY-4P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 12:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57907 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57907-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57907.166350410731533 (code B ref 57907); Sun, 18 Sep 2022 12:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57907) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2022 12:28:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48229 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZtPP-0008CW-BZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:58549) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZtPN-0008CH-Cq for 57907@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:28:25 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC759240026 for <57907@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 14:28:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1663504099; bh=SHoyxhj5IGhVLq99HOnFsX7Clcd1LCWH3LqK1wwrLKw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=oT+WbugCggLSV4ZuXkbqyRZR7VBQ2S/qpKhUFMrKb6a1XgpyXeYJzc9EaOAeTFHmc jLE107YzQukBHkeGhmm58+LySbKhEdK0DiRwReNVsUTLGKxZtQMjbi/YEwVLjcfGeR NmSs9h9Zj+2dTFfD1g7HI0iI5RP/ggjuWezMglcwTRR1IcJJ90puBzMTs02PERbi9s cGoVqxSD5OFmNseCN6hXUJ/qhIPpkbKiCeHcDrzmAfW8h04tcaDLHZbzUaL3dPV0aI Wwl8h05dxDOrkVtYgSVljxG81Nx28SkzSz+0D7oGArT0VdGW6q4JGJogXH06dIMi6m HmMzAHCLjQztQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MVnCR1BsRz9rxP; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 14:28:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87wna027sr.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 18 Sep 2022 14:20:20 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242976 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >> It seems to me that it would be nice to support these too, as keywords >> have the superficial advantage of being a bit more readable due to their >> additional highlighting, and for some people it makes the macro a bit >> more comfortable to use since it doesn't have to feel like you are using >> a whole new language, but instead these are just keyword arguments to an >> unusual function call. > > I think it'd just lead to even more confusion, since they aren't really > keyword arguments. Because then you'd have to say > > (loop ... > :do (progn (foo) (bar))) > > But you can say > > (loop ... > do (foo) > (bar)) Why would this be necessary? I am not saying that `cl-loop' should be converted into a proper keyword-macro, just that each `:foo' in a loop-keyword position ought to be interpreted as `foo'.