From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Visuwesh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58070: [PATCH] Add tamil99 input method Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 19:44:44 +0530 Message-ID: <87leq7r163.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20220925100020.13229-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20220925100244.13482-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87h70vsmyd.fsf@gmail.com> <8335cfmu5h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10020"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: arunisaac@systemreboot.net, 58070@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 25 16:16:37 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ocSQu-0002Sv-GM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 16:16:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43422 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocSQt-0001VI-AA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:16:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocSQN-0001V2-MP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocSQM-0005ef-Mh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ocSQM-0000ae-Ev for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Visuwesh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 14:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58070 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 58070-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58070.16641153052185 (code B ref 58070); Sun, 25 Sep 2022 14:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58070) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2022 14:15:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48296 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ocSPR-0000ZA-J6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f195.google.com ([209.85.214.195]:34718) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ocSPN-0000YL-Uw for 58070@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f195.google.com with SMTP id w13so4136517plp.1 for <58070@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:15:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=v3C70zCgpTEH+7GYOzM2oEZmoPedF5JDH5MjwZ6eVEQ=; b=Cealp4EQu+l7ZoxAJ8F6KclMd9jH2EJF6LXHmADgh0fhiPEd5/tTrP8ygXaEIbVQIR zSCviXMhmkhnCmB861i5+02bKxl28NO1t7cM7sNpoKNViE+94PNEV3hDGmiQ1LV//Ml5 E7ajdYdR42905CraxouULnUrnPWza9YsdoVqztmh0btxq7cSZBBoulTQjwUpR0PCCIZ2 dXl35Dscv+2iXNPPMCmhLZKQeGbQJ627Mj+jdFZM3qxeUtrFgBDVtQ4fJ9jk5IXkpCz1 F9Sm/xuHRC8Y/kvMhZA4pCtpUBimLztt/CmjkXlGeElcNOL5ZIALrtuO3VGWHVOnv8W/ QHXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date; bh=v3C70zCgpTEH+7GYOzM2oEZmoPedF5JDH5MjwZ6eVEQ=; b=F7hMTmAYEimXQSVWO/Z0clO9MLS+3Ex0UYWJbyOy9OjPuRbLVu4RNzX1qb7tVBO4ax fQvs+0F7B31NKnnaQxx7sWPp61KIRjBPZsqJQernOiA+aSggFqHbn2ZcH/OAF0BnJsvV e2d2plnS0LvJ44NtnMOw5SlRhXOWCWk83vUDlk2WCTOcti5OeEvNtBhqjyWSuBKwYC9W 1P6G6eySgfRfnzq7S1SPjxRFybSm497/zJKT6aeyumyCwtkCBgpppcHLivDmS9GWl9gI o4Oj+2Bfzhn2lL32F+irp0dkIhmJyfhfTQZgEMXcD3jA/lSgOZluct1eKcbhYSA/Zkm7 M+bQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3ZNHKmZ/uIaoSenkJWf0ozv3GEvWbimzxNxsvhLRUQCtSrp4Yd yvVTZwJjHViQSy4R1c4wWrU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM46ItFMpEAis4u8g6YbTUAtNdrMUnGLVv7xc1IhmeySgEKyp/HaYu4dcKcZ8OGIVSxx+WEfYg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:33cf:b0:202:5183:c1ab with SMTP id lk15-20020a17090b33cf00b002025183c1abmr19795622pjb.117.1664115296047; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([115.240.90.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y72-20020a62ce4b000000b00540c8ed61ddsm9872711pfg.150.2022.09.25.07.14.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:14:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8335cfmu5h.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 25 Sep 2022 16:59:54 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243595 Archived-At: [=E0=AE=9E=E0=AE=BE=E0=AE=AF=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=B1=E0=AF=81 =E0=AE=9A=E0=AF=86= =E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=9F=E0=AE=AE=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=AA=E0=AE=B0=E0=AF=8D 25= , 2022] Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> AFAIK, MS Windows' tamil99 keyboard layout behaves like mine, whereas >> the ibus layout behaves like your implementation. If you are a heavy >> user of this layout, can you try out the attached? > > Please note that we could have support for both layouts, there's no > particular reason we should have only one. Yes of course but I'm afraid that it will create unneeded confusion, since the differences are quite subtle. So I would prefer the layout which is familiar to most users to get in core. [ If I seemed hasty about getting feedback for my code, it is merely because I cannot be the lab rat myself since I type like a sloth in Tamil99 layout. Moreover, my original goal was to add the layout for Emacs 29. ]