From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs 30.0 warning from `cl-pushnew' and `memql' Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:44:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87lemrlmuj.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <878ritgaty.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87o7rprvia.fsf@web.de> <87zgb913fg.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23369"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:sbXcXccb0o4JyUzUarGeUV4KYD4= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 29 23:12:28 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pB18W-0005w8-Ez for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 23:12:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pB18N-0001py-2g; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 17:12:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pAVn4-0005ql-G2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 07:44:17 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pAVn2-0000Ix-Rx for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 07:44:14 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pAVn1-0005Lp-4Q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:44:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 17:12:17 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142028 Archived-At: tomas wrote: >> This does not render the warning >> >> (cl-pushnew "/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa-src/slime-2.26.1" >> load-path >> :test #'string=) >> >> but this is not a model I can endorse, this is why you have that >> level of abstraction to begin with, i.e., not to be bothered all >> the time with implementation details. > > I don't understand you. That function is most useful if you can > pass it a custom comparison function. I'd say it's fine as it is. It's a useful thing to be able to do to but it could default to a comparison function that works for the data type of the submitted argument, in this case `string=' for the string. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal