From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:24:13 +0000 Message-ID: <87leim2z02.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <83sfcz9rf2.fsf@gnu.org> <09a49ab9-ac72-36a9-3e68-9c633710eba7@gutov.dev> <83r0sh8i1q.fsf@gnu.org> <35638c9d-e13f-fad8-5f95-ea03d65d4aa2@gmail.com> <87a5z3izst.fsf@web.de> <83v8hr7qk9.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm7z7nkc.fsf@gnu.org> <4b63ef62-5e1c-3dcf-ec7b-06b69e79133b@gutov.dev> <83o7nj7mfn.fsf@gnu.org> <556e0fbb-215e-c11d-0e8b-73e97441abbb@gutov.dev> <83pm7y6fdo.fsf@gnu.org> <47140c27-ba63-ca7b-8b9e-cc38a6f9a866@gutov.dev> <838rem636a.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5z2ctpo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32398"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , joaotavora@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 20 20:24:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ppYx2-0008EW-EP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:24:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppYwv-0003Br-8K; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppYws-0003BU-Mx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ppYws-0001q1-Dj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppYws-0007vq-4p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168201503430477 (code B ref 62720); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Apr 2023 18:23:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38664 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppYwj-0007vV-N7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:23:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:48079) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ppYwf-0007vA-Vj for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:23:51 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 247F32402DC for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:23:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1682015024; bh=r54CEFh5XGMYNWfiRcfobwHd9yFqMGwzcs0dRAGQ810=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=eopoflbL5QKnJGV1l+pGX4bzl0jqulQJxFQ7n5kzFx7a0LJ4xkxAenwDzze5Mz8sJ FxKBHxjZR0RBKRVhYMYs9u1lcWWz/fW+CdJxm8VbtruIEdAS851/t3ytVnxDAgORON 2PX8GJY/e2uGowWaLiyyosCCqKXTGckZPEH0DybMCt0jSY8zSqEfI0ah0hr0H+eVky bt3g6oA4qtzhjTqggMcFAynvut7QmcS4pDDG6DJXdgXJDloc3NC2XhJUCTNt8gQ8aL 1MZCkP5SM+gQ2gKGsZmrjYQuYcfxEFQv6SvciqbQfgMguVQWPIfj/hYLGfm5FYrsf+ LkU3UCwcD7bRw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Q2Qyk6nJqz9rxN; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:23:42 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87a5z2ctpo.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:08:19 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:260352 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: >>>>>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 17:25:49 +0300, Eli Zaretskii sai= d: > > Eli> "We" never did want that. Jo=C3=A3o did, for obvious reasons, b= ut that was > Eli> never my intent. The issue is indeed more general: what should > Eli> package-install and package.el in general do with built-in packa= ges > Eli> for which a newer version is on ELPA? We don't yet know the ans= wer to > Eli> that, and no hope of obtaining one before Emacs 29.1 is released > Eli> (barring any calamities). > > "We" may not know that, but by the principle of not giving me things *I* > didn=CA=BCt ask for, *I* don=CA=BCt want ':core' packages being automatic= ally > upgraded, unless I either > > 1. explicitly ask for such an upgrade > 2. have myself somehow installed a newer version already, in which case > it=CA=BCs no longer a ':core' package > > I=CA=BCve not checked, but does what=CA=BCs currently in emacs-29 not giv= e us at > least [1]? Yes, this is currently provided by C-u M-x package-install. 2. should (?) have always been the case. > Robert