From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:08:16 +0000 Message-ID: <87ledrs6kf.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmxj27fn.fsf@dfreeman.email> <831qfrptiq.fsf@gnu.org> <57429221-d9be-5791-e975-b3539905e2f6@gutov.dev> <83a5udlj47.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ledwk4xi.fsf@gnu.org> <76ecf629-a41a-f6e4-f661-2ef926326d6c@gutov.dev> <83zg2cias7.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg27tswt.fsf@localhost> <83cyz3ebhv.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7intrb7.fsf@localhost> <838r9re65e.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13489"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, philipk@posteo.net, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 15:13:25 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhUD-0003J0-N0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:13:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhOs-0002dn-6b; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhOn-0002NG-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:07:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhOj-0000NE-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:07:48 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D01F240104 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:07:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693487264; bh=1GYOo/b9cMbm8knkU4D7ey3qhkCEbBNet66dxvlTFSY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=MnP+fgZN6aELGJGFufLMbaxgBijuKmJ0849m8ceqasWLT5dDEO0rujxrtOidY5LBM z3VF+QFxpU02ZCXwFmwbc2RUn2gx3Kqrz2nqTkQmWVP0yXRgwQ8dtBQm681/MCXAos HL2tvHobjZMD5AFbB77j5zA7tPLCY4I6NXMsKilF6lMzS4K/BP8BdB/79dzdynhpn/ njiJfTjVBBjurGVF/tyc7wuSzcIB7Gm9e5+fciSDWJxfuVlLZ5NcDhB88DWj1amz4d llpo0zTlgxpQptn1k4iDnudsqpnPa2uS5CYAH5YHlO8NDQLRVJ9FjItE6EY2qxfW8q T1FRLU2HZ289A== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Rc1fl1rhBz9rxD; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:07:42 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <838r9re65e.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309653 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Is there anything Org devs can do to help this? > > I don't think so, no. > > But please note that NEWS from emacs-NN branch are "merged" into > NEWS.NN on master, whereas ORG-NEWS seem to describe several versions > in the same file. One more reason to keep them separate, I guess. For ORG-NEWS, it is trivial to separate news from different versions - they are all grouped under the common "Version X.X" heading. > Why do you think we should consider merging these two? what is the > advantage? After recent Emacs release, a number of blog posts and videos appeared reviewing new features and changes in Emacs - none looked into Org mode. That was natural - people looked into NEWS file, but not ORG-NEWS. I am not sure if it is common knowledge that ORG-NEWS file, separate from NEWS is even a thing. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at