From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67683: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Fix 'M-.' on Emacs C sources Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:18:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87le8lfzqr.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> References: <87fs0egwxn.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <838r662tww.fsf@gnu.org> <87il5a58za.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <831qby2an6.fsf@gnu.org> <8734uuwr56.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <831qaey57r.fsf@gnu.org> <87il3qv6em.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83y1cmwkju.fsf@gnu.org> <87edeev4ni.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83wms6wgt2.fsf@gnu.org> <87edeewdnr.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83o7dhx1fw.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Manuel Giraud Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29100"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 67683@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 19 10:19:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rQl25-0007Ld-7h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:19:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQl1i-0003l8-0W; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 04:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQl1g-0003kz-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 04:19:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQl1g-0003Yj-A5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 04:19:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQl1i-0004Uv-7b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 04:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Manuel Giraud Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67683 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 67683-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67683.170565589317232 (code B ref 67683); Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67683) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2024 09:18:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQl0u-0004Ts-TK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 04:18:13 -0500 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]:7880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQl0s-0004Tg-0x for 67683@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 04:18:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=ed25519; bh=+C9nOhuh othvThrVQ/wNOexpS7TTaVzKcmzsNFkk7Ps=; h=date:references:in-reply-to: subject:cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=CCJZSaWxX/kK4wf9oLg0MZIxKQ9shJ AqOmAeq1xMmIVFBYEFx6dRf/6vBlp7gPsLNquq321oFFsh6W51NTdlDA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=+C9nOhuhothvThrV Q/wNOexpS7TTaVzKcmzsNFkk7Ps=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=sys2nmojF8PScLcAqXoW5dYG1a7EB0EBsVmZhh IeCSzye+MSYDVvV5lpcCoAt4/f6uvwUAcFdCTZcdO92di3tzL2jZxTn5dRzc+/wLyQrlt7 DWsoTTZb8vMZ2uPxmuxgJ/Zd0gcJMGtZM17tlwPpyo6PWHr5gtTUmvaDWR4sB9XdTAfbVd ODxS4BN1Y6CKtugj4lLLrVEjrbhjPv8Hk8AADETakQGSfG8hv3x1amxqt7WlW8ac9AFpj/ WZ9yWs2bj8IPMkGKMIqxlrHlxO9WseDFJ0CRlViAwLtseyzoSbU8iLLiYSUaWDV7GC8fV/ c1Vq8MWy2WWehTSDbDqQeK3w== Original-Received: from computer ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c5c28ccd (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:18:06 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83o7dhx1fw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:49:23 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278488 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Manuel Giraud >> Cc: 67683@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 22:10:48 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> [...] >> >> >> I'm not using Edebug but since I currently get "(void-function nil)" >> >> error I did a 'toggle-debug-on-error' and this error triggers when >> >> calling 'tags-included-tables' from 'tags-table-extend-computed-list' >> >> >> >> What is really weird is that if I set myself into the TAGS buffer and >> >> evaluate (tags-included-tables), it works and returns a list of >> >> filenames. >> > >> > And if you type "C-u M-." in the TAGS buffer, then you can type a >> > symbol, and Xref shows its definition allright? IOW, does M-. work >> > from the TAGS buffer? >> >> No "C-u M-." does not work from the TAGS buffer with the same error. > > So then the conclusion is that something in the way > tags-included-tables is invoked from tags-table-extend-computed-list > (or its callers in the M-. scenario) breaks tags-included-tables, even > though invoking tags-included-tables directly works as intended, > right? If so, I suggest to look up the call-stack chain and try to > find what is it that breaks tags-included-tables. Thanks. I have found the problem even though I don't what causes it. It came from the "lisp/TAGS" buffer: in this one, evaluating (tags-included-tables) returns an error. I just had to close this buffer and now xref is working as expected. But I really don't know what caused this buffer to be broken in this regard. Anyway thanks (again) for your kind help. -- Manuel Giraud