From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs Date: 23 Apr 2003 07:43:02 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87k7dlogsp.fsf@nyaumo.jasonrumney.net> References: <84r87ulpts.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <87u1cqy8jc.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <84d6jetmfg.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <87r87up9qi.fsf@nyaumo.jasonrumney.net> <873ck9x6qi.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051080183 920 80.91.224.249 (23 Apr 2003 06:43:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 23 08:43:02 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 198DyA-0000Ei-00 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:43:02 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 198E3m-0007iS-00 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:48:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 198Dyk-0006Uf-00 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 02:43:38 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 198DyP-0006C5-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 02:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 198DyN-00066M-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 02:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from server0011.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.56.14] helo=server0027.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 198DyM-00066E-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 02:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from nyaumo.jasonrumney.net ([195.137.103.251]) h3N6hDSf031361; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:43:13 GMT Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nyaumo.jasonrumney.net) by nyaumo.jasonrumney.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 198DyB-0002Gc-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:43:03 +0100 Original-To: ben@xemacs.org In-Reply-To: <873ck9x6qi.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13381 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13381 Hi Ben, can you answer the following question for me? A simple yes or no is sufficient, we are trying to determine whether there is a simple explanation for XEmacs being noticeably faster than GNU Emacs for network operations on Windows, or if it is due to a bug in GNU Emacs. "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Rumney writes: > > Jason> Does XEmacs implement non-blocking sockets on Windows? > > I don't know. Ask Ben Wing . I know he's done a lot > of work on processes, much of it intended to make processes work > efficiently on Windows within the Unix-centric context of the rest of > XEmacs. He may have done so; I'm sure it would be high on his > priority list.