* hightlight if/ifdef blocks
@ 2006-10-31 8:24 Martin
2006-10-31 12:37 ` Fang lun gang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin @ 2006-10-31 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
after reading some rules about not nesting c comments and using #if 0
instead I tried it out in emacs.
But as it is at the moment, the blocks are not shown as if I would have
commented them out.
Is there an easy way of doing this?
The blocks should look the same way as the comments usually look when
I add a //.
so
// not_used_at_the_moment();
should have the same color as
#if 0
not_used_at_the_moment();
#endif
I tried different things where people suggested that I make these
blocks invisible.
But since that's not what I want ...
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance
Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: hightlight if/ifdef blocks
2006-10-31 8:24 hightlight if/ifdef blocks Martin
@ 2006-10-31 12:37 ` Fang lun gang
2006-11-01 1:31 ` Michaël Cadilhac
[not found] ` <mailman.3.1162344693.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Fang lun gang @ 2006-10-31 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin <m.gercke@gmail.com> writes:
Martin> Hi, after reading some rules about not nesting c comments and using
Martin> #if 0 instead
Martin> // not_used_at_the_moment();
Would you please share the rules of why not nesting c comments?
I used to thought it is ok to nest comments marked using "//".
--
Fang lun gang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: hightlight if/ifdef blocks
2006-10-31 12:37 ` Fang lun gang
@ 2006-11-01 1:31 ` Michaël Cadilhac
[not found] ` <mailman.3.1162344693.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michaël Cadilhac @ 2006-11-01 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 920 bytes --]
Fang lun gang <no@mail.com> writes:
>>>>>> "Martin" == Martin <m.gercke@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Martin> Hi, after reading some rules about not nesting c comments and using
> Martin> #if 0 instead
> Martin> // not_used_at_the_moment();
>
> Would you please share the rules of why not nesting c comments?
>
> I used to thought it is ok to nest comments marked using "//".
// are not « native » C comment ;-)
I think Martin was talking about nesting /* */. The use of #if 0 is
quite a good practice.
--
/!\ My mail address changed, please update your files accordingly.
| Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac | Le copillage-collage |
| Epita/LRDE Promo 2007 | tue le programmeur. |
| http://michael.cadilhac.name | -- Dictons LRDE |
`-- - JID: micha@amessage.be --' - --'
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 152 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
help-gnu-emacs mailing list
help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: hightlight if/ifdef blocks
[not found] ` <mailman.3.1162344693.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
@ 2006-11-01 15:05 ` Fang lun gang
2006-11-02 8:22 ` Martin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Fang lun gang @ 2006-11-01 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> "Michaël" == Michaël Cadilhac <michael@cadilhac.name> writes:
Michaël> I think Martin was talking about nesting /* */. The use of #if 0 is
Michaël> quite a good practice.
Thank you.
So you mean if we can use '//', we'd prefer "#if 0" to "/* */".
--
Fang lun gang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: hightlight if/ifdef blocks
2006-11-01 15:05 ` Fang lun gang
@ 2006-11-02 8:22 ` Martin
2006-11-03 12:20 ` Fang lun gang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin @ 2006-11-02 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
originally I asked somebody about using // or /* */ in C.
1. old c-compilers do not allow the use of // because it was not part
of the "old" ANSI c standard.
2. new c-compilers mostly do, but some people still prefer to use /* */
My idea was to use // in "regular" comments and /* */ for commenting
out huge blocks of code.
I was then told that nesting of comments might or might not work with
the one or the other compiler.
To avoid this uncertainty I should use #if 0 which I think makes sense
and is ok for me. (can't find the post though, sorry ...)
However, emacs does not show me these blocks as "unused" comments, but
as c-code.
So, back to my original question ... how to get these blocks to change
their color :-)
Martin
Fang lun gang wrote:
> >>>>> "Michaël" == Michaël Cadilhac <michael@cadilhac.name> writes:
>
> Michaël> I think Martin was talking about nesting /* */. The use of #if 0 is
> Michaël> quite a good practice.
>
> Thank you.
>
> So you mean if we can use '//', we'd prefer "#if 0" to "/* */".
>
> --
> Fang lun gang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: hightlight if/ifdef blocks
2006-11-02 8:22 ` Martin
@ 2006-11-03 12:20 ` Fang lun gang
2006-11-05 11:01 ` Martin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Fang lun gang @ 2006-11-03 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin <m.gercke@gmail.com> writes:
Martin> might or might not work with the one or the other compiler. To
Martin> avoid this uncertainty I should use #if 0 which I think makes sense
Martin> and is ok for me. (can't find the post though, sorry ...) However,
Martin> emacs does not show me these blocks as "unused" comments, but as
Martin> c-code. So, back to my original question ... how to get these
Martin> blocks to change their color :-)
Thanks at first.
As to your original question, I known there is a hide-ifdef-mode although it
may not satisfy you.
--
Fang lun gang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: hightlight if/ifdef blocks
2006-11-03 12:20 ` Fang lun gang
@ 2006-11-05 11:01 ` Martin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin @ 2006-11-05 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
As far as I understood the hide-ifdef-mode correctly it can either hide
code completely or partially.
As I just want to highlight the code this (in fact) doesn't help me.
Thanks anyway
Martin
Fang lun gang wrote:
> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin <m.gercke@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Martin> might or might not work with the one or the other compiler. To
> Martin> avoid this uncertainty I should use #if 0 which I think makes sense
> Martin> and is ok for me. (can't find the post though, sorry ...) However,
> Martin> emacs does not show me these blocks as "unused" comments, but as
> Martin> c-code. So, back to my original question ... how to get these
> Martin> blocks to change their color :-)
>
> Thanks at first.
>
> As to your original question, I known there is a hide-ifdef-mode although it
> may not satisfy you.
>
> --
> Fang lun gang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-05 11:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-31 8:24 hightlight if/ifdef blocks Martin
2006-10-31 12:37 ` Fang lun gang
2006-11-01 1:31 ` Michaël Cadilhac
[not found] ` <mailman.3.1162344693.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-11-01 15:05 ` Fang lun gang
2006-11-02 8:22 ` Martin
2006-11-03 12:20 ` Fang lun gang
2006-11-05 11:01 ` Martin
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.