From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:32:58 +0900 Message-ID: <87k4wvqa9x.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87r5r47t7p.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87y6lcqkpn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r5r3r20d.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <874onz180h.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1260450799 19058 80.91.229.12 (10 Dec 2009 13:13:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 14:13:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NIipM-0003ev-MW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:13:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48812 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NIipM-00079P-8h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:13:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NIi8y-0003I0-F7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:29:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NIi8o-0003GP-W0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:29:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47247 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NIi8o-0003G2-Ga for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:29:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:57863) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NIi8k-0003ip-K3; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9157FFA; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:29:00 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F36371A2638; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:32:58 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <874onz180h.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" 1444e28f1a3d XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118522 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > I don't see why "state of the repository at time point x" is relevant > for anything. *shrug* Stefan asked about "consistency", I explained. The remarks labelled "IMO" should be construed to mean I agree with you about relevance.