From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracker change tomorrow Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:49:25 +0900 Message-ID: <87k4wm5n7u.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87oclyg04r.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871viur7us.fsf@red-bean.com> <87vdg6mri0.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1261018007 25739 80.91.229.12 (17 Dec 2009 02:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 17 03:46:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NL6Nz-0002Fi-Pw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:46:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52472 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NL6Nz-0006IO-C9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:46:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NL6Nt-0006I8-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:46:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NL6No-0006Hb-32 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:46:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59933 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NL6Nn-0006HY-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:46:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:52089) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NL6Nn-0006n1-Ic for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:46:27 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50621535AE; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:46:18 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 804971A2A94; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:49:25 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" 1444e28f1a3d XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118667 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > But why sharing the web address? Do they share more? It's often the case that bugs are shared, yes. For example in Emacs there are products that are part of Emacs in all but name because of legal issues (AUCTeX, for one). Is it an AUCTeX bug or an Emacs bug? Heck, do we even care?