From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow? Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:48:00 -0500 Message-ID: <87k4vtfxq7.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <20100103174743.GB1653@muc.de> <87bphbhxxt.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100106131039.GB2447@muc.de> <4B448FF5.5060900@gnu.org> <87hbqze39u.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100107134011.GA2381@muc.de> <87wrzuc93h.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100107145216.GB2381@muc.de> <87aawqt05b.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262898274 9330 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 21:04:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Alan Mackenzie To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 22:04:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSzWr-0006ES-Lz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:04:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40225 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSzWr-00020I-PF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:04:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSzHB-0001bR-FF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSzH6-0001at-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:48:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55575 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSzH5-0001aq-SG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:48:07 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.206.141]:53767) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSzH3-0008Ix-TT; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34533 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NSzGz-0004ne-4Z; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:48:01 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:51:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119619 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: >Karl Fogel wrote: > >> Yes. I *think* we are having a savannah problem here, not a bzr >> problem. People may find it faster to use the Launchpad.net mirror of >> Emacs until Savannah gets bzr+ssh:// access (smart server). > >Have you tried asking rms to ask the Savannah admins to please make >improving support for GNU bzr a high priority? I've made similar requests of RMS before, and his response was: "Mail the Savannah admins list and CC me." which seems like a reasonable course of action. Someone here want to do it?