From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: redisplay system of emacs Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:31:47 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87k4ui4gik.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <27349166.post@talk.nabble.com> <27560255.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B754E74.8060705@swipnet.se> <27563610.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B7564C7.1010309@swipnet.se> <27564728.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B756FB7.3050202@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265988745 18074 80.91.229.12 (12 Feb 2010 15:32:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:32:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 16:32:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfxVF-0003Uo-Ta for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:32:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41389 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NfxVF-0000Ug-6M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:32:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NfxVA-0000Ti-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:32:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42545 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NfxV3-0000R2-IU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:32:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfxV2-0000vb-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:39605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfxV2-0000vV-MX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfxV1-0003Ju-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:32:07 +0100 Original-Received: from p5b2c2462.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.44.36.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:32:07 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by p5b2c2462.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:32:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b2c2462.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VwmkODzC7OrhdoMjYS3iKy8SmjA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121080 Archived-At: Jan Djärv writes: > What you are describing is basically double buffering. Since Gtk+ > does this already, it makes sense for Emacs to go that way too, I don't see this dependency. > either by using more Gtk+ (we now turn double buffering off), In particular if one can tell Gtk+ not to double buffer. > or develop its own. I don't think that the performance in partly obscured windows is really that important. Or maybe I don't understand what this is about. -- David Kastrup