From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows build broken in Fmake_network_process Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:48:52 -0400 Message-ID: <87k4sywpvv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <83634jglab.fsf@gnu.org> <831vf7ge57.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6hfeyzw.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdcig87f.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269650952 12448 80.91.229.12 (27 Mar 2010 00:49:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Helmut Eller , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 27 01:49:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvKD1-0004zQ-P1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:49:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42843 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvKD1-0005ql-9n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvKCw-0005qL-QH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55064 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvKCv-0005pf-PW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvKCs-0007N4-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po34.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.80]:37580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvKCs-0007Mz-Br; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014175.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po34.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o2R0mq9f028883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:48:52 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 96736C011; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:48:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83vdcig87f.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:05:08 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.94 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122746 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Solution for what? The previous code had no problems on Windows. The > bug report that triggered the new code was deeply rooted in Posix > behavior; the solution is Posix-centric code, and was never tested on > Windows. Why should it be run on Windows, and what ``problem'' will > that solve? I conditioned the patch out for WINDOWSNT, for now, to avoid breaking the Windows build. However, could you investigate whether we could link in getsockopt in the Windows build? Although the original bug recipe in Bug#5173 does not look relevant to Windows, Bug#5723 might be.