From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Symbol's function definition is void: x-register-dnd-atom Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:11:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87k4ojxz8y.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87sk38xo29.fsf@telefonica.net> <4C4C1A85.9090804@swipnet.se> <87ocdvy3t5.fsf@telefonica.net> <4C4C62E0.8090208@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280077925 30144 80.91.229.12 (25 Jul 2010 17:12:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:12:05 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 25 19:12:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od4k6-0003nO-2r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:12:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51677 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Od4k5-00074s-Ha for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43009 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Od4jy-00074h-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od4jx-0000Pt-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:37425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od4jx-0000Pd-Le for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od4jw-0003iv-0U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:11:52 +0200 Original-Received: from 83.42.13.171 ([83.42.13.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:11:52 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 83.42.13.171 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:11:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.42.13.171 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+ikOP8fSWQD7x7qHmJF4tECsTkQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127768 Archived-At: "Jan D." writes: >> BTW, it seems to me that there are quite a few broken >> configurations. This is an instance: if HAVE_X11 is not defined, the >> problem described on the subject arises. > > It is kind of assumed that some defines belong together, such as > USE_LUCID can't be used unless HAVE_X11 is defined, ditto for > USE_X_TOOLKIT. I guess you aren't running configure, if you where > this wouldn't happen (unless configure itself is messed up). I'm using cmake and the configure tests is work in progress. Still, I thought that HAVE_X11 could be undefined even when USE_LUCID is on. Seems I was wrong. [snip]