From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas Bulka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Face differences between emacs-nox & windows-nt Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:45:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87k4ltivfv.fsf@mail.tbulka.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286487977 17054 80.91.229.12 (7 Oct 2010 21:46:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:46:17 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 23:46:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3yI0-0007h3-Dj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:46:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42931 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3yHw-0000FW-PY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51530 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3xL3-0001Hv-Nd for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:45:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xKz-0005ze-NW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.162]:20032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xKz-0005ys-EK for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:45:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1286484310; l=616; s=domk; d=tbulka.de; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=GGLO/PNTwWXz1rEVwbNKi6W5y5o=; b=KPjyvzYS5KrvOK8Nf9ukxld2uYVvyT6VrLkg2P7WF+e7kKA/t0rSQTStJkGs84nczIt 6M0JheyPAy3yRqXTV4nQWEYlxmdnqWm1XMbf9AI/c+Iu+SdJf0dxNo6r7zJA1evzmXKJs x37dmDxCZnnCsKekTqDrNYrWhe6OCXst4F0= X-RZG-AUTH: :IWAkYUK9d/QirByFh+0ZN2bclLznCPPhSHsTaQbCjMvyY4N8RKo37T0= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Original-Received: from localhost (p5B3F6882.dip.t-dialin.net [91.63.104.130]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo38) (RZmta 23.5) with ESMTP id j01e29m97IoEi3 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:45:10 +0200 (MEST) In-Reply-To: (Gary's message of "Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:23:21 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:45:30 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:75092 Archived-At: Gary writes: >> Yes: the former is a text terminal, the latter is a GUI session. >> Emacs cannot control the fonts and default colors of a text terminal. >> It can do that on a graphics display. > > Can I persuade it to not do it on a graphics display :) I don't know if I fully got your point. But wouldn't be using Emacs outside the terminal an option for you? In case you use two GUI-versions of Emacs it might be easier to reach a similar appearance. I'm not sure about your specific case, though, because I do not have any experience in using Emacs on Windows.