From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:47:09 +0200 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87k4b40wua.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87mxgem09k.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E2A7EBD.7050300@gmx.at> <87livooqt6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E2B158B.1080101@gmx.at> <87wrf8iyse.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E2BEED2.5040608@gmx.at> <8739hvu6lh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E2C50E6.3020103@gmx.at> <878vrnweju.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E2D34D7.4040002@gmx.at> <87r55cjvef.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311767258 27319 80.91.229.12 (27 Jul 2011 11:47:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:47:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 27 13:47:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm2aM-0007W2-5A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:47:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58554 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm2aL-0005dc-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:47:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60651) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm2aF-0005KV-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:47:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm2aA-0008AQ-9r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm2aA-0008AA-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:47:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm2a8-0007QU-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from p508eac21.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.142.172.33]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from dak by p508eac21.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:47:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508eac21.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bkxrW8Cg4FwCOW28reSiwIBN1Yw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142380 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Juanma Barranquero writes: > >> Which makes me wonder if, really, developing such sweeping changes in >> a branch is such a good idea, once past the point where everything >> seems to be more or less in place. > > Developing in a separate branch seems to have been successful for Eli's > bidi work, so I think it varies. IIRC, the development was stalled in that separate branch, and he just kept working on a private version. So it does not seem like the best example. -- David Kastrup