all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@gnu.org>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Cc: sds@gnu.org, 11273@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#11273: 24.0.94; quitting gdb
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:47:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k41bhdn6.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <r7k41bsnl9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:17:22 -0400")

Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:

> Chong Yidong wrote:
>
>> In the meantime, I installed a workaround to explicitly call
>> delete-process on the pty in the sentinel of the main gdb process.
>
> Maybe you fixed bug#4437 then?

Aha, looks like the situation is this:

In Bug#4437, Nick Roberts proposed a patch to process.c to avoid sending
a SIGCHLD to itself when it receives an EIO errno.  However, he noted
that this

   means that status_notify isn't called from
   wait_reading_process_output because this call is conditioned on
   select which returns a positive value (presumably because the pty's
   file descriptor hasn't been cleared).

which is the problem I noticed.  Nick didn't commit the patch at the
time.

In Bug#10933, Troels Nielsen independently proposed the same patch,
which was committed by Stefan on 2012-03-23.

The question is what to do about the problem.  I didn't test this, but
it may be that the patch causes ALL process sentinels to be blocked
while the gdb process is running, which is kinda unacceptable.





  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-19 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-18 18:22 bug#11273: 24.0.94; quitting gdb Sam Steingold
2012-04-19  8:27 ` Chong Yidong
2012-04-19 16:17   ` Glenn Morris
2012-04-19 16:47     ` Chong Yidong [this message]
2012-04-19 17:26       ` Glenn Morris
2012-04-19 18:22       ` Troels Nielsen
2012-04-20  2:50         ` Chong Yidong
2012-04-20  6:42           ` Chong Yidong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k41bhdn6.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=cyd@gnu.org \
    --cc=11273@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=rgm@gnu.org \
    --cc=sds@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.