From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12218: 24.2.50; vc-ediff: Pressing `n' moves focus away from ediff control panel Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 20:40:20 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87k3v3ebo3.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87pq6pvmw4.fsf@gmail.com> <506F076B.9040204@gmx.at> <874nm8alm4.fsf@gmail.com> <506F21F5.1050208@gmx.at> <877gr44v08.fsf@gmail.com> <506F3001.1030305@gmx.at> <87391sg0z4.fsf@gmail.com> <506FE852.5020603@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349545909 21256 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2012 17:51:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12218@debbugs.gnu.org, Jambunathan K To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 06 19:51:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TKYXa-0001ZL-Mu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:51:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57684 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKYXU-0000gP-RM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:51:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54995) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKYXS-0000gJ-AQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKYXR-0007YG-4S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKYXR-0007Y7-0k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKYXi-0002AS-3M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12218 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12218-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12218.13495458768281 (code B ref 12218); Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12218) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2012 17:51:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKYWx-00029V-7g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:37571 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKYWv-00029I-L7 for 12218@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:51:14 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46645451C23C; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 10:50:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <506FE852.5020603@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:14:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65287 Archived-At: >> If multiple-frames is problematic (on some machines) shouldn't the >> default be modified to be just plain. > > If more people complained, this would probably happen. But IIUC ediff > is not very popular and largely unmaintained. > >> But, in that case, people like me, who are used to seeing the control >> panel float to top-right, will complain that the defaults are changed >> :-). > > Likely. I've been told on this list that my one-frame setup for ediff > is non-standard and any problems it causes "won't be a problem for most > users" ;-) If you are collecting statistics on ediff usage on a one-frame setup, here is what I have in ~/.emacs: (custom-set-variables '(ediff-split-window-function (quote split-window-horizontally)) '(ediff-window-setup-function (quote ediff-setup-windows-plain)) I guess people are not complaining about bad defaults because they have customized them already.