From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does anyone really use emacs in terminal? Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 18:40:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3n8qf7l.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <0b72021c-139f-4269-8e81-5b5ef97fb83d@googlegroups.com> <8761yu64e4.fsf@Servus.decebal.nl> <87r4higq45.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip2tyftv.fsf@yahoo.fr> <20130508155351.GA5399@hysteria.proulx.com> <87obclrrb9.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <25153223-A058-4762-A1FC-7744472B958A@Web.DE> <87obckqg7f.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368117683 6676 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2013 16:41:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 16:41:23 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 09 18:41:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTu5-0004gw-T6 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 18:41:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36566 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTu5-0002sm-Gr for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:41:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41615) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTtq-0002s7-Ev for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:41:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTtp-00068d-Bx for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:40:58 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTto-00068Z-UM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTth-0004CH-38 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 18:40:49 +0200 Original-Received: from 149.red-83-40-116.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.40.116.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 18:40:49 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 149.red-83-40-116.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 18:40:49 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.red-83-40-116.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eBxgIf5fk+taYrFCBuEndZcti1o= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:90590 Archived-At: Jai Dayal writes: > You just admitted not yet Vim but then want emacs mode in vim to be exactly > emacs? At any rate, that functionality is available in Vim. > > So again, the initial statement doesn't hold, at all. There is a huge difference among "not 100% vim yet" (vim emulation on Emacs) with "the most simple features forever" (Emacs emulation on Vim) And now I wonder why I'm arguing on yet another stupid editor flamewar, considering that I'm a happy user of Emacs and Vi(m), currently using Emacs+vimpulse and enjoying the best of both worlds.