Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

> No, the rule should be something like
>
>    (`(:close-all . ,_) t)

Ah, ok. How does this look to you?

Note that it makes the new behavior the default one, because "close all"
sounds more fitting to characterize the current behavior ("closing" all
sexps ending on the current line).

If that's not what you meant, maybe a different method name is in order.