From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-element, spurious command??
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:31:59 +0100
Message-ID: <87k3edcbr4.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <52CAC991.80202@roklein.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58381)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1W0D5e-0003VO-E8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:31:52 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1W0D5Y-0001mf-KC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:31:46 -0500
Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]:37828)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1W0D5Y-0001lF-Dg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:31:40 -0500
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a1so16051458wgh.35
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:31:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52CAC991.80202@roklein.de> (Robert Klein's message of "Mon, 06
	Jan 2014 16:19:45 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Robert Klein <roklein@roklein.de>
Cc: Org Mode Mailing List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Robert Klein <roklein@roklein.de> writes:

> I've been reading lisp/org-element.el, when I found a command lounging
> around in the middle of the file outside of any defun:
>
> (put 'org-element-map 'lisp-indent-function 2)
>
> on line 4275 (maint tree this morning).
>
> Is this intended to be there?

Yes, it is. `org-element-map' is defined just above. This sexp sets
indentations rules for it.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou