From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18399: 24.4.50; nadvice :filter-args -vs- interactive Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:29:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87k35ido98.fsf@web.de> References: <87mwagbhim.fsf@tromey.com> <87zjegh1wj.fsf@web.de> <87iol4baqs.fsf@tromey.com> <8738c7oubb.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409935354 13395 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2014 16:42:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18399@debbugs.gnu.org, tom@tromey.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 18:42:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPwRw-00025n-LE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:33:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59037 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPwRw-0000xe-8l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:33:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50715) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPwOn-0004oe-N1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPwOh-0003Xj-Qw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPwOh-0003Wl-Ka for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPwOg-0001yX-Hr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18399 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 18399-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18399.14099346007561 (code B ref 18399); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18399) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2014 16:30:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPwOd-0001xr-Kc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:30:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:51280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPwOa-0001xd-IT for 18399@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:29:57 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.190.254]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LetUp-1YBMgT1jXL-00qguv; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:29:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:24:36 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uv9Zv4UrYtXMJdX/q/g7gTK3VzwzUmwKjflUpjpHeGp4mtc+Hmg WiObeIMn0+Jp/2FiGPcGmkn/YdYJ42hntUhi1kubytQKEOMlvNOoyz70pzd4i4Qht442UM7 3II4Ps5MZ4tTfVI2Y6J3MVXZcNAJAliB+SV8jxKQ/50cKmBatME4l4zkDizyHmRhPAVO9yR zEubQpuhfgx/lhAgEEa/Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93074 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > But I'm not sure if that covers what Tom meant. > > The fact that we mention the unusual calling convention there does > partly cover it. Ok, I agree, let's keep the patch as is, thanks. Michael.